Home | Browse | Search | Credits | About
Register | User Area | DL-Harvest | Help
DLIST

Identifying Open Access Articles: Valid and Invalid Methods

Goodman, David and Antelman, Kristin and Bakkalbasi, Nisa (2005) Identifying Open Access Articles: Valid and Invalid Methods. In Proceedings Charleston Conference: Issues in Book and Serial Acquisition, Charleston, SC.

Full text available as:
PDF - Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader or other PDF viewer.
Microsoft Powerpoint Presentation (.ppt) - Requires Microsoft Powerpoint

Abstract

Many versions of an article are now visible on the web, including not only open access (OA), but also paid access, preliminary versions, abstracts, and mere references or citations. The purpose of OA requires not only that the article can be read without the barrier of payment, but also that the reader can find the article to be read without the barrier of extensive searching. We will demonstrate the dubious validity of one prominent system for identifying OA and measuring the amount of OA and the OA Advantage. We will then briefly discuss the remaining alternatives.

EPrint Type:Conference Paper
Keywords:Open Access Open Access Advantage
Subjects:Scholarly Communication
ID Code:968
Deposited On:03 December 2005
Eprint Statistics:View statistics for this eprint
Tell A Colleague:Tell a colleague about it.
EPrints dLIST, an open access archive for the Information Sciences, is supported by the School of Information Resources and Library Science and Learning Technologies Center, University of Arizona. Established in 2002, dLIST has a global Advisory Board and is a part of the Information Technology & Society Research Lab. Open Archives
Contact: Admin | Donate