Home | Browse | Search | Credits | About
Register | User Area | DL-Harvest | Help
DLIST

The Impact of Open Access on Library and Information Science (A Research project)

Malone, Cheryl Knott and Coleman, Anita Sundaram (2005) The Impact of Open Access on Library and Information Science (A Research project).

Full text available as:
PDF - Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader or other PDF viewer.

Abstract

This is the text of a proposal (unfunded) submitted by Cheryl Knott Malone and Anita Coleman, School of Information Resources and Library Science, University of Arizona, Tucson to the IMLS National Leadership Grants 2005. To what extent does open access improve the impact of an article? This is the deceptively simple question that we will investigate. Our question is an important one if a clear understanding about the open access archive (OAA) phenomenon and what it means for our discipline, Library and Information Science (LIS) is ever to be achieved. We will use DLIST as the testbed for answering our key research question. DLIST is the Digital Library for Information Science and Technology <http://dlist.sir.arizona.edu>, an OAA, where scholars can self-register and deposit research, education, and practice publications that center on cultural heritage institutions such as libraries, archives, and museums. DLIST was established in the summer of 2002 as a disciplinary repository for LIS. DLIST runs on open source software, Eprints, and is compliant with Open Archives Initiative-Protocol for Metadata Harvesting (OAI-PMH). Thus DLIST is an interoperable data provider in the global chain of OAI repository services. Currently DLIST has about 500 users and 400 documents. Usage of DLIST has grown from 41,156 hits in February 2004 to 112,728 hits in January 2005. To answer the research question we will undertake the following activities over a period of three years. In the first year we will 1) digitize articles from the back issues of the Journal of Education for Library and Information Science (JELIS), the premier journal for all matters related to library education; 1) conduct a citation study of JELIS articles to benchmark their research impact prior to deposit in DLIST, 2) deposit and create the metadata for digitized JELIS articles in DLIST; and 3) complete the writing of a DLIST User Guide and Self-Archiving Workshops manual. In the second year of the project, we will 1) survey LIS faculty to determine a baseline of copyright awareness and scholarly communication behaviors related to self-archiving in the LIS education community, and 2) offer DLIST self-archiving workshops at four selected conferences. The workshops will introduce scholars to OAA and how to self-archive using DLIST. In the third year of the project, 1) participants who completed the DLIST workshops and surveys will be surveyed again, 2) a follow-up citation study to document citation rates and patterns of the digitized and deposited JELIS articles will be conducted, and 3) will be analyzed with usage of JELIS articles in DLIST to understand the impact of open access. The goal of the second survey is to determine how behaviors may have changed and find out how the JELIS articles in DLIST, were used in ways that may not be revealed through mere citation data. This will contribute a richer understanding of impact than if we had only quantitative data from DLIST usage logs and citation rates and patterns (traditional research impact factors only) for JELIS. Current experience with DLIST has given us tantalizing evidence that open access to the JELIS articles will have an impact and that the nature of the impact will be diverse and rich, not just limited to research citations. For example, informally gathered DLIST usage ‘nuggets’ are often about the usefulness of DLIST materials for classroom teaching (sometimes in a global context, as when we learned that it is used in a LIS school in Czechoslovakia) and networking among LIS teachers, researchers and practitioners.

EPrint Type:Other
Keywords:Journal of Education for Library and Information Science; JELIS
Subjects:Scholarly Communication
ID Code:967
Deposited On:10 November 2005
Eprint Statistics:View statistics for this eprint
Tell A Colleague:Tell a colleague about it.

1. ALISE, Association for Library and Information Science Education. LIS research areas classification scheme. <http://www.alise.org/research_class_guide.html>

2. Antelman, K. Do Open Access Articles Have A Greater Research Impact? < http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/staff/kantelman/do_open_access_CRL.pdf>

3. Brody, T., Stamerjohanns, H., Harnad, S. Gingras, Y. Vallieres, F. & Oppenheim, C. (2004) The effect of Open Access on Citation Impact. Presented at: National Policies on Open Access (OA) Provision for University Research Output: an International meeting. Southampton University, Southampton UK. 19 February 2004. <http://opcit.eprints.org/feb19prog.html>.

4. Budd, J. M. (2000). Scholarly productivity of U.S. LIS faculty: an update. The Library Quarterly, 70(2), 230-245.

5. Budd, J. M.; & Seavey, C. A. (1996). Productivity of U.S. library and information science faculty: the Hayes study revisited. The Library Quarterly, 66(1), 1-20.

6. Coleman, A. 2005. Instruments of cognition: Use of citations and web links in online teaching materials. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56 (3).

7. Coleman, A. 2004. Citation indexes for online interdisciplinary learning. Presentation at the Multimedia Educational Resource for Learning and Online Teaching (MERLOT) Annual Conference, August 3-6, Costa Mesa, CA. < http://www.sir.arizona.edu/faculty/coleman/merlot04/merlot04asc1.pdf>

8. Foster, N.F., and Gibbons, S. 2005. Understanding faculty to improve content recruitment for institutional repositories. D-Lib Magazine 11 (1): January.

9. Goedeken, E. (2002) The Literature of American Library History, 1999-2000. Libraries & Culture 37 (2): 138-174.

10. Harnad, S. (1995) Universal FTP Archives for Esoteric Science and Scholarship: A Subversive Proposal. In: Ann Okerson & James O'Donnell (Eds.) Scholarly Journals at the Crossroads; A Subversive Proposal for Electronic Publishing. Washington, DC., Association of Research Libraries, June 1995.

11. Harnad, S. & Brody, T. (2004) Comparing the Impact of Open Access (OA) vs. Non-OA Articles in the Same Journals. D-Lib Magazine, 10 (6), June. <http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june04/harnad/06harnad.html>.

12. Hitchcock, S. , Brody, T., Gutteridge, C., Carr, L. & Harnad, S. The Impact of OAI-based Search on Access to Journal Papers. <http://opcit.eprints.org/serials-short/serials11.html>

13. JESSE Listserv. < http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/jesse.html>

14. Kurtz, M.J. (2004) Restrictive access policies cut readership of electronic research journal articles by a factor of two, Harvard-Smithsonian Centre for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA. <http://opcit.eprints.org/feb19oa/kurtz.pdf>.

15. Lawrence, S. (2001) Online or Invisible? Nature 411 (6837): 521 <http://www.neci.nec.com/~lawrence/papers/online-nature01/>.

16. Malone, C. K. , Coleman, A. , Xia, J. & Nelson, S. 2005. (Research Poster) Copyright Transfer Agreements in an Interdisciplinary Repository. ALISE 2005 Conference, 10 –14 January, Boston, Massachusetts.

17. Odlyzko, A. (2002) The Rapid Evolution of Scholarly Communication, Learned Publishing 15 (January): 7-19.

18. OAISTER. <http://oaister.umdl.umich.edu/>

19. OpCit Project. (2005) The effect of open access and downloads (‘hits’) on citation impact: a bibliography of studies. <http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html>

20. Pringle, J. (2004) Do Open Access Journals Have Impact? Nature (Web Focus). <http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/19.html>.

21. RoMEO Studies. <http://www.lboro.ac.uk/departments/ls/disresearch/romeo/>

22. Smith, L.C. (1999). Journal of the American Society for Information Science (JASIS): Past, Present, and Future. JASIS 50 (11): 965-969.

23. Suber, P. 2005. Open Access News. <http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/fosblog.html>

24. Swan, A. & Brown, S.N. (2004a) Authors and open access publishing. Learned Publishing 2004:17(3) 219-224.

25. Swan, A. & Brown, S.N. (2004b) JISC/OSI Journal Authors Survey Report. <http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/JISCOAreport1.pdf>.

26. Testa, J. & McVeigh M. E. (2005) The Impact of Open Access Journals: A Citation Study from Thompson ISI. <http://www.isinet.com/media/presentrep/acropdf/impact-oa-journals.pdf>

27. Perneger, T.V. Relationship between online“hit” counts and subsequent citations: prospective study of research papers in the BMJ. <http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/329/7465/546>

28. Ulrichs Periodicals Directory/ <http://www.ulrichsweb.com/ulrichsweb/>

EPrints dLIST, an open access archive for the Information Sciences, is supported by the School of Information Resources and Library Science and Learning Technologies Center, University of Arizona. Established in 2002, dLIST has a global Advisory Board and is a part of the Information Technology & Society Research Lab. Open Archives
Contact: Admin | Donate