Home | Browse | Search | Credits | About
Register | User Area | DL-Harvest | Help
DLIST

Application of Neural Networks to Population Pharmacokinetic Data Analysis

Chow, Hsiao-Hui and Tolle, Kristin M. and Roe, Denise J. and Elsberry, Victor and Chen, Hsinchun (1997) Application of Neural Networks to Population Pharmacokinetic Data Analysis. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 86(7):pp. 840-845.

Full text available as:
PDF - Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader or other PDF viewer.

Abstract

This research examined the applicability of using a neural network approach to analyze population pharmacokinetic data. Such data were collected retrospectively from pediatric patients who had received tobramycin for the treatment of bacterial infection. The information collected included patient-related demographic variables (age, weight, gender, and other underlying illness), the individual’s dosing regimens (dose and dosing interval), time of blood drawn, and the resulting tobramycin concentration. Neural networks were trained with this information to capture the relationships between the plasma tobramycin levels and the following factors: patient-related demographic factors, dosing regimens, and time of blood drawn. The data were also analyzed using a standard population pharmacokinetic modeling program, NONMEM. The observed vs predicted concentration relationships obtained from the neural network approach were similar to those from NONMEM. The residuals of the predictions from neural network analyses showed a positive correlation with that from NONMEM. Average absolute errors were 33.9 and 37.3% for neural networks and 39.9% for NONMEM. Average prediction errors were found to be 2.59 and -5.01% for neural networks and 17.7% for NONMEM. We concluded that neural networks were capable of capturing the relationships between plasma drug levels and patient-related prognostic factors from routinely collected sparse withinpatient pharmacokinetic data. Neural networks can therefore be considered to have potential to become a useful analytical tool for population pharmacokinetic data analysis.

EPrint Type:Journal Article (Paginated)
Keywords:National Science Digital Library, NSDL, Artificial Intelligence Lab, AI Lab, Neural Network Approach
Subjects:Data Mining
Medical Libraries
ID Code:424
Deposited On:20 August 2004
Alternative Locations:http://ai.bpa.arizona.edu/go/papers.html
Eprint Statistics:View statistics for this eprint
Tell A Colleague:Tell a colleague about it.

1. Yuh, L.; Beal, S.; Davidian, M.; Harrison, F.; Hester, A.; Kowalski, K.; Vonesh, E.; Wolfinger, R. Biometrics 1994, 50, 566-575.

2. Sheiner, L. B.; Ludden, T. M. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 1992, 32, 185-209.

3. Whiting, B.; Kelman, A. W.; Grevel, J. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 1986, 11, 387-401.

4. 4.Veng-Pederson, P.; Modi, N. B. J. Pharmacokinet. Biopharm. 1992, 20, 397-412.

5. 5.Hussain, A. S.; Johnson, R. D.; Vachharajani, N. N.; Ritschel, W. A. Pharm. Res. 1993, 10, 466-469.

6. Chow, H.; Chen, H.; Ng, T.; Myrdal, P.; Yalkowsky, S. H. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1995, 35, 723-728.

7. Gobburu, J. V. S.; Chen, E. P. J. Pharm. Sci. 1996, 85, 505-510.

8. Brier, E. M.; Zurada, J. M.; Aronoff, G. R. Pharm. Res. 1995, 12, 406-412.

9. Rumelhart, D. E.; Hinton, G. E.; Williams, R. J. In Parallel Distributed Processing; Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L., the PDP Research Group, Eds.; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1986; pp 45-76.

10. Sheiner, L. B.; Beal, S. L. J. Pharmacokinet. Biopharm. 1981, 9, 503-512.

11. Erb, R. J. Pharm. Res. 1993, 10, 165-170.

12. Rumelhart, D. E.; Widrow, B.; Lehr, M. A. Commun. ACM 1994, 37, 87-92.

EPrints dLIST, an open access archive for the Information Sciences, is supported by the School of Information Resources and Library Science and Learning Technologies Center, University of Arizona. Established in 2002, dLIST has a global Advisory Board and is a part of the Information Technology & Society Research Lab. Open Archives
Contact: Admin | Donate