Comparison of Three Vertical Search Spiders

1. A. Arasu et al., “Searching the Web,” ACM Trans.

Internet Technology, vol. 1, no. 1, 2001, pp. 2-43.

2. E. Amitay, “Using Common Hypertext Links to Identify

the Best Phrasal Description of Target Web Documents,”

Proc. ACM Special Interest Group on

Information Retrieval (SIGIR 98), Post-Conf. Workshop

on Hypertext Information Retrieval for the

Web, ACM Press, 1998; www.mri.mq.edu.au/

~einat/sigir/.

3. M. Najork and J.L. Wiener, “Breadth-First Search

Crawling Yields High-Quality Pages,” Proc. 10th

WWW Conf., 2001; www10.org/cdrom/papers/

208/.

4. J. Cho, H. Garcia-Molina, and L. Page, “Efficient

Crawling through URL Ordering,” Proc. 7th WWW

Conf., 1998; www7.scu.edu.au/programme/

fullpapers/1919/com1919.htm.

5. H. Chen and T. Ng, “An Algorithmic Approach to

Concept Exploration in a Large Knowledge Network

(Automatic Thesaurus Consultation): Symbolic

Brand-and-Bound Search vs. Connectionist Hopfield

Net Activation,” J. Am. Soc. Information Science,

vol. 46, no. 5, 1995, pp. 348-369.

6. K.L. Kwok, “A Neural Network for Probabilistic

Information Retrieval,” Proc. 12th ACM-SIGIR

Conf., ACM Press, 1989, pp. 21-30.

7. J.J. Hopfield, “Neural Networks and Physical Systems

with Emergent Collective Computational Abilities,”

Proc. Nat’l Academy of Science, vol. 79, no.

4, 1982, pp. 2554-2558.

8. H. Chen et al., “HelpfulMed: Intelligent Searching

for Medical Information over the Internet,” accepted

for publication in J. Am. Soc. for Information Science

and Technology.

9. K.M. Tolle and H. Chen, “Comparing Noun Phrasing

Techniques for Use with Medical Digital Library

Tools,” J. Am. Soc. Information Science, vol. 51, no.

4, 2000, pp. 352-370.

10. T.H. Haveliwala, Efficient Computation of Page-

Rank, tech. report, Stanford Univ., Stanford, Calif.,

1999; http://dbpubs.stanford.edu:8090/pub/1999-

31.