Virtual reference service evaluation: Adherence to RUSA behavioral guidelines and IFLA digital reference guidelines

Alford, B. L., & Sherrell, D. L. (1996). The role of affect in consumer satisfaction

judgments of credence-based services. Journal of Business Research, 37, 71–84.

Arnold, J., & Kaske, N. (2005). Evaluating the quality of a chat service. Portal: Libraries

and the Academy, 5(2), 177-193.

Bitner, M. J., Booms, B. H., & Tetreault, S. (1990). The service encounter: Diagnosing

favorable and unfavorable incidents. Journal of Marketing, 54, 71–84.

Bobrowsky, T., Beck, L., & Grant, M. (2005). The chat reference interview: Practicalities

and advice. Reference Librarian, 43(89/90), 179-191.

Bopp, R., & Smith, L. (2001). Reference and Information Services: An Introduction (3rd

ed.). Englewood CO: Libraries Unlimited.

Bushallow-Wilbur, L., DeVinney, G., & Whitcomb, F. (1996). Electronic mail reference

service: A study. Reference Quarterly, 35(3), 359-371. Retrieved March 9, 2007 from

http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/classifications/

The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (2000). The Carnegie

Classification of Institutions of Higher Education.

Carter, D. S., & Janes, J. (2003). Unobtrusive data analysis of digital reference questions

and service at the Internet Public Library: An exploratory study. Library Trends,

49(2), 251-265.

Coffman, S. (2003). Going live: Starting and running a virtual reference service.

Chicago, IL: American Library Association.

Coffman, S., & Arret, L. (2004). To chat or not to chat: Taking yet another look at virtual

reference. The Searcher, 12(8), 49-56.

Croft, R., & Eichenlaud, N. (2006). E-mail reference in a distributed learning

environment: Best practices, user satisfaction, and the reference services continuum.

Journal of Library Administration, 45(1/2), 117-147.

Cummings, J., Cummings, L., & Frederiksen, L. (2007). User preferences in reference

services: Virtual reference and academic libraries. Portal: Libraries and the Academy,

7(1), 81-96.

Churchill, G. A., & Surprenant, C. (1983). An investigation into the determinants of

consumer satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 491–504.

Dewdney, P., & Ross, C. S. (1994). Flying a light aircraft: Reference service evaluation

from a user’s viewpoint. Reference Quarterly, 34(2), 217-230.

Durrance, J. (1989). Reference success: Does the 55 percent rule tell the whole story?

Library Journal, 114, 31-36.

Durrance, J. (1995). Factors that influence reference success: What makes questionnaires

willing to return? The Reference Librarian, 49/50, 243-265.

Emery, J. (2005). Is our best good enough: Educating end-users about licensing terms.

Journal of Library Administration, 42(3/4), 27-39.

Fagan, J. C., & Desai, C. M. (2003). Communication strategies for instant messaging and

chat reference services. Reference Librarian, 38(79/80), 121-156.

Fernandez, J. (2004). Facing live reference. Online, 28(3), 37-40

Gatten, J. N., & Radcliff, C. J. (2001). Assessing reference behaviors with unobtrusive

testing. In D.P. Wallace & C. Van Fleet, (Eds), Library evaluation: A casebook and

can-do guide (pp.105-15). Englewood, CO; Libraries Unlimited.

Gers, R., & Seward, L.J. (1985). Improving reference service: Results of a state-wide

survey. Library Journal, 110(18), 32-35.

Gilbert, L. M., Liu, M., Matoush, T., & Whitlatch, J. B. (2006). Digital reference and

online instructional services in an integrated public/university library. The Reference

Librarian, 46(95-96), 149-172.

Gross, M., & Saxton, M. L. (2002). Integrating the imposed query into the evaluation of

reference service: A dichotomous analysis of user ratings. Library & Information

Science Research, 24, 251-263.

Hernon, P., & Calvert, P. (2005). E-service quality in libraries: Exploring its features and

dimensions. Library & Information Science Research, 27, 377-404.

Hernon, P., & McClure, C. R. (1986). Unobtrusive reference testing: The 55 percent rule.

Library Journal, 111(7), 37-41.

International Federation of Library Associations (2005). IFLA digital reference

guidelines. Retrieved January 5, 2006 from

http://www.ifla.org/VII/s36/pubs/drg03.htm

Janes, J. (2002). Digital reference: Reference librarians' experiences and attitudes.

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(7),

549-566.

Kaske, N., & Arnold, J. (2002). An unobtrusive evaluation of online real time library

reference services. Retrieved February 20, 2005 from

http://www.lib.umd.edu/groups/digref/kaskearnoldunobtrusive.html

Katz, W. A. (2002). Introduction to Reference Work. Vol.II: Reference Services and

Reference Processes (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

King, V., Nichols, J., & Padilla, G. (2006). Moving back to campus: Creating a local

virtual reference service. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 11(3), 1-17.

Kwon, N. (2004). Assessing the virtual reference success using the revised RUSA

guidelines for behavioral performance of reference and information service providers,

Proceedings of the 6th Virtual Reference Desk Annual Conference. Cincinnati, OH,

November 8, 2004. Retrieved May 15, 2006 from

http://www.vrd2004.org/proceedings/kwon.htm

Kwon, N. (2006). User satisfaction with referrals at a collaborative virtual reference

service. Information Research, 11(2). Retrieved April, 19, 2005 from

http://informationr.net/ir/11-2/paper246.html

Kwon, N. (2007). Public library patrons' use of collaborative chat reference service: The

effectiveness of question answering by question type. Library & Information Science

Research, 29(1), 70-91

McClure, C., Lankes, R., D., Gross, M., & Choltco-Devlin, B. (2002). Statistics,

measures and quality standards for assessing digital library services: Guidelines and

Procedures. ERIC Clearinghouse. Retrieved December 22, 2005 from

http://quartz.syr.edu/rdlankes/tiki-download_file.php?fileId=7

Pomerantz, J., Lou, L., & McClure, C. R. (2006). Peer review of chat reference

transcripts: Approaches and strategies. Library & Information Science Research, 28 (1),

24-48.

Pomerantz, J., Nicholson, S., Belanger, Y., & Lankes, D. (2004). The current state of

digital reference: Validation of a general digital reference model through a survey of

digital reference services. Information Processing & Management, 40, 347-363.

Radford, M. L. (2006). Encountering virtual users: A qualitative investigation of

interpersonal communication in chat reference. Journal of the American Association

for Information Science and Technology, 57(8), 1046-1059.

Reference and User Services Association (2004a). Guidelines for behavioral

performance of reference and information service providers. Retrieved January 5,

2006 from

http://www.ala.org/ala/rusa/rusaprotools/referenceguide/guidelinesbehavioral.htm

Reference and User Services Association (2004b). Guidelines for implementing and

maintaining virtual reference services. Retrieved September 20, 2005 from

http://www.ala.org/ala/rusa/rusaprotools/referenceguide/virtrefguidelines.htm

Richardson, J. V. (2002). Reference is better than we thought. Library Journal, 127(15),

41-42.

Ronan, J., Reakes, P., & Cornwell, G. (2003). Evaluating online real-time reference in an

academic library: Obstacles and recommendations. The Reference Librarian, 79/80,

225-240.

Saxton, M. L., & Richardson, J. V. (2002). Understanding reference transactions:

Transforming an art into a science. New York: Academic Press.

Shachaf, P., & Horowitz, S. (2006). Are virtual reference services color blind? Library &

Information Science Research, 28(4), 501-520.

Sloan, B. (1998). Electronic reference services: Some suggested guidelines. Reference

and Users Services Quarterly, 38(1), 77-81.

Stacy- Bates, K. (2003). E-mail reference responses from academic ARL libraries: An

unobtrusive study. Reference and User Services Quarterly, 43(1), 59-70.

Tunon, J., Barsun, R., & Ramiraz, L. L. (2004). Pests, welcomed guests, or tolerated

outsiders: Attitudes of academic librarians toward distance students from unaffiliated

institutions. Journal of Library Administration, 41(3/4), 485-505.

Ueltschy, L. C., Laroche, M., Tamilia, T. D., & Yannopoulosd, P. (2004). Cross-cultural

invariance of measures of satisfaction and service quality. Journal of Business

Research, 57(8), 901-912.

Walter, V. A., & Mediavilla, C. (2005). Teens are from Neptune, librarians are from

Pluto: An analysis of online reference transactions. Library Trends, 54(2), 209-227.

Ward, D. (2003). Measuring the completeness of reference transactions in online chats;

Results of an unobtrusive study. Reference and User Services Quarterly, 44(1), 46-

58.

Ward, D. (2005). Why users choose chat?: A survey of behavior and motivations.

Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 10(1), 29-46.

White, M. D. (2001). Digital reference services: Framework for analysis and evaluation.

Library & Information Science Research, 23, 211-231.

Whitlatch, J. B. (1989). Unobtrusive studies and the quality of academic reference

services. College & Research Libraries, 50(2), 181-194.

Whitlatch, J.B. (1990). Reference service effectiveness. Reference Quarterly, 30(2), 205-

220

Whitlatch, J. B. (2001). Evaluating reference services in the electronic age. Library

Trends, 50(2), 207-217.

Zhuo F., Love, M., Norwood, S., & Massia, K. (2006). Applying RUSA guidelines in the

analysis of chat reference transcripts. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 13(1), 75-

88