Home | Browse | Search | Credits | About
Register | User Area | DL-Harvest | Help
DLIST

Deliberate bias in Knowledge Organization? Advances in Knowledge Organization, vol. 11, 2008, pp. 256-261.

Hjørland, Birger (2008) Deliberate bias in Knowledge Organization? Advances in Knowledge Organization, vol. 11, 2008, pp. 256-261. . In Proceedings Tenth International ISKO Conference, 11, pages pp. 256-261, Montréal, Canada.

There is a more recent version of this eprint available. Click here to view it.

Full text available as:
Microsoft Word Document (.doc) - Requires Microsoft Word

Abstract

“Bias” is normally understood as a negatively loaded word, as something to be avoided or minimized, for example, in statistics or in knowledge organization. Recently Melanie Feinberg suggested, however, that “if we cannot eliminate bias, then we should instead attempt to be more responsible about it and explicitly decide on and defend the perspectives represented in information systems”. This view is linked to related views: That knowledge organization is too much concerned with information retrieval and too much described in the mode of scientific discovery, as opposed to the mode of artifact design: “From the literary warrant of Hulme to the terminological warrant of the Classification Research Group (CRG), to Hjørland’s domain analysis, the classificationist seems like one who documents and compiles, and not one who actively shapes design.” This paper examines these claims, which may be understood as questions about subjectivity and objectivity in classification and about positivism versus pragmatism in research. Is KO an objective and neutral activity? Can it be? Should it be? A dominant view has been that knowledge and KO should be understood as a passive reflection of an external order. This has been termed the mirror metaphor of knowledge and is related to empiricism and positivism. The opposite view – which is in accordance with both Feinberg and Hjørland – states that knowledge organization should be functional and thus reflecting given goals, purposes and values. It is related to pragmatism in philosophy.

EPrint Type:Conference Paper
Subjects:Knowledge Organization
ID Code:2411
Deposited On:10 August 2008
Eprint Statistics:View statistics for this eprint
Tell A Colleague:Tell a colleague about it.

Best, Steven (2000). Book review of Harding (1998): Is Science Multicultural? Postcolonialism, Feminism, and Epistemologies. Theory and Society, 29(2), 268-275. (Retrieved 2007-12-22). http://web.archive.org/web/20010707065736/http://utminers.utep.edu/best/books8.htm

Bliss, Henry Evelyn (1929).The organization of knowledge and the system of the sciences. With an introduction by John Dewey. New York: Henry Holt and Co.

Code, Lorraine (1998). Feminist epistemology. IN: Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Version 1.0, London: Routledge.

Feinberg, Melanie (2007a). Beyond retrieval: A proposal to expand the design space of classification. Proceedings of the North American Symposium on Knowledge Organization, vol. 1. Retrieved 2007-06-07 from: http://dlist.sir.arizona.edu/1892/

Feinberg, Melanie (2007b). "Hidden bias to responsible bias: an approach to information systems based on Haraway's situated knowledges" Information Research, 12(4) paper colis07. http://informationr.net/ir/12-4/colis/colis07.html

Furner, Jonathan (2007). Dewey Deracialized: A Critical Race-Theoretic Perspective. Knowledge Organization, 34(3), 144-168.

Gjerløff, Anne Katrine (1999). Løgn og levn - arkæologi og det historiske kildebegreb. Arkæologisk Forum no 1, 2-8. http://www.archaeology.dk/forum/forum01_gjerloeff.pdf

Haraway, Donna (1988). Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599. (Retrieved 2007-12-22). http://www.staff.amu.edu.pl/~ewa/Haraway,%20Situated%20Knowledges.pdf

Hjørland, Birger (1997). Information Seeking and Subject Representation. An Activity-theoretical approach to Information Science. Westport & London: Greenwood Press.

Hjørland, Birger (2002). Domain analysis in information science. Eleven approaches - traditional as well as innovative. Journal of Documentation, 58(4), 422-462. http://web.archive.org/web/20040721022850/http://www.db.dk/bh/publikationer/Filer/JDOC_2002_Eleven_approaches.pdf

Hjørland, Birger, & Hartel, Jenna (2003). Afterward: ontological, epistemological and sociological dimensions of domains. Knowledge Organization, 30(3–4), 239–245.

Kierkegaard, Søren (1850) The Journals of Søren Kierkegaard X(3) A 652.

Olson, Hope A. (2002). The Power to Name: Locating the Limits of Subject Representation in Libraries. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

Toulmin, S. (1972/1977). Human understanding. The collective use and evolution of human concepts. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. (Paperback edition 1977).

Ørom, Anders (2003). Knowledge Organization in the domain of Art Studies - History, Transition and Conceptual Changes. Knowledge Organization 30(3/4), 128-143.

Available Versions of this Item

EPrints dLIST, an open access archive for the Information Sciences, is supported by the School of Information Resources and Library Science and Learning Technologies Center, University of Arizona. Established in 2002, dLIST has a global Advisory Board and is a part of the Information Technology & Society Research Lab. Open Archives
Contact: Admin | Donate