Home | Browse | Search | Credits | About
Register | User Area | DL-Harvest | Help
DLIST

Toward an Epistemology of Wikipedia

Fallis, Don (2008) Toward an Epistemology of Wikipedia. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59(10).

Full text available as:
PDF - Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader or other PDF viewer.

Abstract

Wikipedia (the “free online encyclopedia that anyone can edit”) is having a huge impact on how a great many people gather information about the world. So, it is important for epistemologists and information scientists to ask whether or not people are likely to acquire knowledge as a result of having access to this information source. In other words, is Wikipedia having good epistemic consequences? After surveying the various concerns that have been raised about the reliability of Wikipedia, this paper argues that the epistemic consequences of people using Wikipedia as a source of information are likely to be quite good. According to several empirical studies, the reliability of Wikipedia compares favorably to the reliability of traditional encyclopedias. Furthermore, the reliability of Wikipedia compares even more favorably to the reliability of those information sources that people would be likely to use if Wikipedia did not exist (viz., websites that are as freely and easily accessible as Wikipedia). In addition, Wikipedia has a number of other epistemic virtues (e.g., power, speed, and fecundity) that arguably outweigh any deficiency in terms of reliability. Even so, epistemologists and information scientists should certainly be trying to identify changes (or alternatives) to Wikipedia that will bring about even better epistemic consequences. This paper suggests that, in order to improve Wikipedia, we need to clarify what our epistemic values are and we need a better understanding of why Wikipedia works as well as it does.

EPrint Type:Journal Article (On-line/Unpaginated)
Keywords:Encyclopedias, Epistemic Values, Mass Collaboration, Reliability, Social Epistemology, Verifiability, Wikipedia, Wisdom of Crowds
Subjects:Epistemology
Internet
Social Epistemology
ID Code:2400
Deposited On:06 October 2008
Eprint Statistics:View statistics for this eprint
Tell A Colleague:Tell a colleague about it.

Adler, B. T., & de Alfaro, L. (2007). A content-driven reputation system for the Wikipedia. Proceedings of the International World Wide Web Conference. Retrieved November 15, 2007 from http://www.soe.ucsc.edu/~luca/papers/07/wikiwww2007.pdf

Anderson, C. (2006). The long tail. New York: Hyperion.

Anthony, D., Smith, S. W., & Williamson, T. (2007). The quality of open source production: Zealots and good Samaritans in the case of Wikipedia. Dartmouth Technical Report. Retrieved November 15, 2007 from http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/reports/abstracts/TR2007-606/

Atkinson, R. (1996). Library functions, scholarly communication, and the foundation of the digital library: Laying claim to the control zone. Library Quarterly, 66, 239-265.

Black, M. (1983). The prevalence of humbug and other essays. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Birnholtz, J. P. (2007). When do researchers collaborate? Toward a model of collaboration propensity. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 2226-2239.

Borland, J. (2007). See who's editing Wikipedia: Diebold, the CIA, a campaign. Wired. Retrieved November 15, 2007 from http://www.wired.com/politics/onlinerights/news/2007/08/wiki_tracker

Bragues, G. (2007). Wiki-philosophizing in a marketplace of ideas: Evaluating Wikipedia's entries on seven great minds. Retrieved November 15, 2007 from http://ssrn.com/abstract=978177

Coady, D. (2006). When experts disagree. Episteme, 3, 68-79.

Cohen, G. A. (2002). Deeper into bullshit. In S. Buss, & L. Overton (eds.), Contours of agency (pp. 321-339). Cambridge: MIT University Press.

Cohen, N. (2007). Courts turn to Wikipedia, but selectively. New York Times. Retrieved November 15, 2007 from http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/29/technology/29wikipedia.html

Cronin, B. (2005). BLOG: see also Bathetically Ludicrous Online Gibberish. Retrieved November 15, 2007 from http://www.slis.indiana.edu/news/story.php?story_id=958

Cross, T. (2006). Puppy smoothies: Improving the reliability of open, collaborative wikis. First Monday, 11. Retrieved February 1, 2008 from http://www.firstmonday.org/ISSUES/issue11_9/cross/

Denning, P., Horning, J., Parnas, D., & Weinstein, L. (2005). Wikipedia risks. Communications of the ACM, 48, 152.

Descartes, R. (1996). Meditations on first philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Devgan, L., Powe, N., Blakey, B., & Makary, M. (2007). Wiki-Surgery? Internal validity of Wikipedia as a medical and surgical reference. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 205, S76-S77.

Duguid, P. (2006). Limits of self-organization: Peer production and "laws of quality". First Monday, 11. Retrieved November 15, 2007 from http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_10/duguid/

Ellickson, R. C. (1991). Order without law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Encyclopaedia Britannica. (2006). Fatally flawed: Refuting the recent study on encyclopedic accuracy by the journal Nature. Retrieved November 15, 2007 from http://corporate.britannica.com/britannica_nature_response.pdf

Estlund, D. M. (1994). Opinion leaders, independence, and Condorcet's jury theorem. Theory and Decision, 36, 131-162.

Fallis, D. (2004a). Epistemic value theory and information ethics. Minds and Machines, 14, 101-117.

Fallis, D. (2004b). On verifying the accuracy of information: Philosophical perspectives. Library Trends, 52, 463-487.

Fallis, D. (2006). Social epistemology and information science. In B. Cronin (Ed.), Annual review of information science and technology (Vol. 40, pp. 475-519). Medford, New Jersey: Information Today.

Fallis, D. (2007). Toward an epistemology of intellectual property. Journal of Information Ethics, 16, 34-51.

Fallis, D., & Frické, M. (2002). Indicators of accuracy of consumer health information on the Internet. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 9, 73-79.

Feldman, R. (2003). Epistemology. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Fox, C., Levitin, A., & Redman, T. (1994). The notion of data and its quality dimensions. Information Processing and Management, 30, 9-19.

Frankfurt, H. G. (2005). On bullshit. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Frické, M., & Fallis, D. (2004). Indicators of accuracy for answers to ready reference questions on the Internet. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55, 238-245.

Giles, J. (2005). Internet encyclopaedias go head to head. Nature, 438, 900-901.

Giles, J. (2007). You can put your trust in Wikipedia 2.0: Wikipedia wants to be seen as more reliable, but will the changes it is planning deter genuine contributors? New Scientist, 195, 28-29.

Goldman, A. I. (1999). Knowledge in a social world. New York: Oxford University Press.

Goldman, A. I. (2001). Experts: Which ones should you trust? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 63, 85-110.

Goldman, A. I. (2008). The social epistemology of blogging. In J. van den Hoven, & J. Weckert (eds.), Information technology and moral philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved January 17, 2008 from http://fas-philosophy.rutgers.edu/goldman/Social%20Epistemology%20of%20Blogging.pdf

Gorman, G. E. (2007). A tale of information ethics and encyclopedias; or, is Wikipedia just another internet scam? Online Information Review, 31, 273-276.

Guinnee, E. (2007). A new context for knowledge creation. Library Student Journal. Retrieved November 15, 2007 from http://www.librarystudentjournal.org/index.php/lsj/article/view/18/44

Hardin, R. (2003). If it rained knowledge. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 33, 3-24.

Hernon, P. (1995). Disinformation and misinformation through the internet: Findings of an exploratory study. Government Information Quarterly, 12, 133-139.

Hume, D. (1977). An enquiry concerning human understanding. Indianapolis: Hackett.

Impicciatore, P., Pandolfini, C., Casella, N., & Bonati, M. (1997). Reliability of health information for the public on the world wide web: systematic survey of advice on managing fever in children at home. British Medical Journal, 314, 1875-1879.

James, W. (1979). The will to believe and other essays in popular philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Keen, A. (2007). Cult of the amateur. New York: Doubleday.

Kelton, K., Fleischmann, K. R., & Wallace, W. A. (2008). Trust in digital information. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59, 363-374.

Kitcher, P. (1992). The naturalists return. Philosophical Review, 101, 53-114.

Kronick, D. A. (1988). Anonymity and identity: editorial policy in the early scientific journal. Library Quarterly, 58, 221-237.

Lackey, J., & Sosa, E. (2006). The epistemology of testimony. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lally, A. M., & Dunford, C. E. (2007). Using Wikipedia to extend digital collections. D-Lib Magazine, 13. Retrieved November 15, 2007 from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/may07/lally/05lally.html

Levi, I. (1967). Gambling with truth. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Lih, A. (2004). Wikipedia as participatory journalism: Reliable sources? Metrics for evaluating collaborative media as a news resource. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Online Journalism. Retrieved November 15, 2007 from http://jmsc.hku.hk/faculty/alih/publications/utaustin-2004-wikipedia-rc2.pdf

Luyt, B., Aaron, T. C. H., Thian, L. H., & Hong, C. K. (2008). Improving Wikipedia's accuracy: Is edit age a solution? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59, 318-330.

Magnus, P. D. (2006). Epistemology and the Wikipedia. Paper presented at the North American Computing and Philosophy Conference. Retrieved November 22, 2007 from http://hdl.handle.net/1951/42589

Maher, P. (1993). Betting on theories. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Mann, T. (1993). Library research models. New York: Oxford University Press.

Meola, M. (2000). Review of Knowledge in a social world by Alvin I. Goldman. College and Research Libraries, 61, 173-174.

Meyer, B. (2006). Defense and illustration of Wikipedia. Retrieved November 15, 2007 from http://se.inf.ethz.ch/~meyer/publications/wikipedia/wikipedia.pdf

Mill, J. S. (1978). On liberty. Indianapolis: Hackett.

Page, S. E. (2007). The difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Pang, A. S.-K. (1998). The work of the encyclopedia in the age of electronic reproduction. First Monday, 3. Retrieved November 15, 2007 from http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue3_9/pang/

Paterson, R. W. K. (1979). Towards an axiology of knowledge. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 13, 91-100.

Plato. (1961). Collected Dialogues. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Poe, M. (2006). The Hive. Atlantic Monthly. Retrieved November 15, 2007 from http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200609/wikipedia

Pritchard, D. (2007). Recent work on epistemic value. American Philosophical Quarterly, 44, 85-110.

Rainie, L., & Tancer, B. (2007). Data memo. Retrieved November 15, 2007 from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Wikipedia07.pdf

Read, B. (2006). Can Wikipedia ever make the grade? Chronicle of Higher Education, 53(10), A31.

Read, B. (2007a). Middlebury College History Department limits students' use of Wikipedia. Chronicle of Higher Education, 53(24), A39.

Read, B. (2007b). Wikipedia fights bogus credentials. Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved November 15, 2007 from http://chronicle.com/wiredcampus/article/1923/expertise-on-trial-on-wikipedia

Rieh, S. Y. (2002). Judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53, 145-161.

Riggs, W. D. (2003). Balancing our epistemic ends. Nous, 37, 342-352.

Rosenzweig, R. (2006). Can history be open source? Wikipedia and the future of the past. Journal of American History, 93, 117-146.

Sanger, L. (2005). The early history of Nupedia and Wikipedia: A memoir. Retrieved November 15, 2007 from http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/18/164213

Schiff, S. (2006). Know it all. New Yorker. Retrieved November 15, 2007 from http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2006/07/31/060731fa_fact

Shera, J. (1970). Sociological foundations of librarianship. New York: Asia Publishing House.

Sunstein, C. R. (2006). Infotopia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Surowiecki, J. (2004). The wisdom of crowds. New York: Doubleday.

Swanson, D. R. (1986). Fish Oil, Raynaud's syndrome, and undiscovered public knowledge. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 30, 7-18.

Tapscott, D., & Williams, A. D. (2006). Wikinomics. New York: Portfolio.

Thagard, P. (1997). Internet epistemology: Contributions of new information technologies to scientific research. Retrieved November 15, 2007 from http://cogsci.uwaterloo.ca/Articles/Pages/Epistemology.html

Thagard, P. (2006). How to collaborate: Procedural knowledge in the cooperative development of science. Southern Journal of Philosophy, 44, S177-S196.

Tollefsen, D. (2007). Group testimony. Social Epistemology, 21, 299-311.

Viegas, F. B., Wattenberg, M., & Dave, K. (2004). Studying cooperation and conflict between authors with history flow visualizations. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Retrieved November 15, 2007 from http://alumni.media.mit.edu/~fviegas/papers/history_flow.pdf

Waldron, J. (1995). The wisdom of the multitude: Some reflections on Book 3, Chapter 11 of Aristotle's Politics. Political Theory, 23, 563-584.

Warner, J. (2005). Labor in information systems. In B. Cronin (Ed.), Annual review of information science and technology (Vol. 39, pp. 551-573). Medford, New Jersey: Information Today.

Willinsky, J. (2007). What open access research can do for Wikipedia. First Monday, 12. Retrieved January 17, 2008 from http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue12_3/willinsky/

Wilson, P. (1983). Second-hand knowledge. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press.

Winchester, S. (1998). The professor and the madman. New York: HarperCollins.

Wray, K. B. (2002). The epistemic significance of collaborative research. Philosophy of Science, 69, 150-168.

EPrints dLIST, an open access archive for the Information Sciences, is supported by the School of Information Resources and Library Science and Learning Technologies Center, University of Arizona. Established in 2002, dLIST has a global Advisory Board and is a part of the Information Technology & Society Research Lab. Open Archives
Contact: Admin | Donate