Home | Browse | Search | Credits | About
Register | User Area | DL-Harvest | Help
DLIST

The Knowledge Pyramid: A Critique of the DIKW Hierarchy

Fricke, Martin (2008) The Knowledge Pyramid: A Critique of the DIKW Hierarchy.

Full text available as:
PDF - Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader or other PDF viewer.

Abstract

The paper evaluates the Data-Information-Knowledge-Wisdom (DIKW) Hierarchy. This hierarchy is part of the canon of information science and management. The paper considers whether the hierarchy, also known as the ‘Knowledge Hierarchy’, is a useful and intellectually desirable construct to introduce, whether the views expressed about DIKW are true and have evidence in favour of them, and whether there are good reasons offered or sound assumptions made about DIKW. Arguments are offered that the hierarchy is unsound and methodologically undesirable. The paper identifies a central logical error that DIKW makes. The paper identifies the dated and unsatisfactory philosophical positions of operationalism and inductivism as the philosophical backdrop to the hierarchy. The paper concludes with a sketch of some positive theories, of value to information science, on the nature of the components of the hierarchy: that data is anything recordable in a semantically and pragmatically sound way, that information is what is known in other literature as ‘weak knowledge’, that knowledge also is ‘weak knowledge’ and that wisdom is the possession and use, if required, of wide practical knowledge, by an agent who appreciates the fallible nature of that knowledge.

EPrint Type:Preprint
Keywords:data; information; knowledge; wisdom, the DIKW Hierarchy, the Knowledge Hierarchy, the Knowledge Pyramid.
Subjects:Information Science
ID Code:2327
Deposited On:11 June 2008
Eprint Statistics:View statistics for this eprint
Tell A Colleague:Tell a colleague about it.

[1] J. Rowley, The wisdom hierarchy: representations of the DIKW hierarchy, Journal of Information Science 33(2) (2007) 163-180.

[2] M.J. Bates, Information and knowledge: an evolutionary framework for information science, Information Research 10(4) (2005) paper 239.

[3] J. Listserv. DIKW. Jesse Listserv 14.5 2005 [cited Message posted to the Jesse electronic mailing list, archived at http://listserv.utk.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0512&L=jesse&T=0&X=0CF5BF3EF0390CDC08&P=1733].

[4] R.L. Ackoff, From data to wisdom, Journal of Applied Systems Analysis 16 (1989) 3–9.

[5] M.J. Adler, A Guidebook to Learning : for a Lifelong Pursuit of Wisdom. (Macmillan, New York, 1986).

[6] M. Zeleny, Management support systems: towards integrated knowledge management, Human Systems Management 7(1) (1987) 59–70.

[7] G. Ryle, Knowing how and knowing that. In: G. Ryle (ed.), Collected Papers, Vol II: Collected Essays (1929-1968), (Barnes & Noble, Inc., New York, 1946).

[8] S. Haack, A fallibilist among the cynics, Skeptical Inquirer 23(1) (1999) 47-50.

[9] A. Musgrave, Common Sense, Science, and Scepticism : a Historical Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993).

[10] P.W. Bridgman, The Logic of Modern Physics. (Macmillan, New York, 1927).

[11] P.W. Bridgman, The Nature of Physical Theory. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1936).

[12] H. Feigl. Positivism in the Twentieth Century (Logical Empiricism). Dictionary of the History of Ideas 1974 5/1/2003 [cited 2008 February 17]; Available at: http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/cgi-local/DHI/dhiana.cgi?id=dv3-69.

[13] C.G. Hempel, A logical appraisal of operationalism, Scientific Monthly 79 (1954) 215-220.

[14] I. Hacking, Introduction to Probability and Inductive Logic. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001).

[15] B. Skyrms, Choice and Chance: An Introduction to Inductive Logic 4th revised ed. (Wadsworth, Belmont, CA, 2000).

[16] P.C. Austin and M.A. Goldwasser, Pisces did not have increased heart failure: Data-driven comparisons of binary proportions between levels of a categorical variable can result in incorrect statistical significance levels, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 61(3) (2008) 295-300.

[17] P.C. Austin, et al., Testing multiple statistical hypotheses resulted in spurious associations: a study of astrological signs and health, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 59(9) (2006) 871-2.

[18] L. Dye. Do Libras Live Longer? 2007 [cited 2008 March 20 2008]; Available at: http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/Story?id=2890150&page=1.

[19] K.R. Popper, Conjectures and Refutations. (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1963).

[20] C.G. Hempel, Philosophy of Natural Science. (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1966).

[21] T.S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 2nd ed. ( University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1962).

[22] D. Carr, The logic of knowing how and ability, Mind 88 (1979) 394-409.

[23] P. Snowdon, Knowing How and Knowing That: A Distinction Reconsidered, Proceedings of The Aristotelian Society 104 (2004) 1-29.

[24] J.R. Anderson, Language, Memory, and Thought. (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1976).

[25] A. Newell, Human Problem Solving. (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1972).

[26] M.E. Polanyi, Personal Knowledge: towards a Post-Critical Philosophy (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1958).

[27] F. Machlup, Semantic quirks in studies of information. In: F. Machlup and U. Mansfield (ed.), The Study of Information: Inter-disciplinary Message, (Wiley, New York, NY., 1983).

[28] C. Howson and P. Urbach, Scientific Reasoning : the Bayesian Approach 2nd ed. (Open Court, Chicago, 1993).

[29] E.T. Jaynes, Probability Theory : the Logic of Science / E.T. Jaynes, ed. G.L. Bretthorst. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2003).

[30] J.F. Sowa, Knowledge Representation: Logical, Philosophical, and Computational Foundations. (Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, CA, 2000).

[31] K.R. Popper, The Logic of Scientific Discovery. (Hutchinson, London, 1959).

[32] A. Clark, Natural-Born Cyborgs: Minds, Technologies, and the Future of Human Intelligence. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003).

[33] P. Tichy, An approach to Intensional Analysis, Nous 5(3) (1971) 273-297.

[34] P. Tichy, The analysis of natural language. In: V. Svoboda, B. Jesperson & C. Cheyne (ed.), Pavel Tichy's Collected Papers in Logic and Philosophy, (University of Otago Press, Dunedin, New Zealand, 2004).

[35] E.F. Codd, A relational model of data for large shared data banks, Communications of the ACM 13(6) (1970) 377-387.

[36] M.J. Bates, Fundamental forms of information, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57(8) (2006) 1033-1045.

[37] N.J. Belkin, Information concepts for Information Science, Journal of Documentation 34(1) (1978) 55-85.

[38] M. Frické, Information using likeness measures, Journal of the American Society for Information Science 48(10) (1997) 882-892.

[39] L. Floridi, Information. In: L. Floridi (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Computing and Information, (Blackwell, Oxford - New York, 2004).

[40] G.J. Chaitin, Information, Randomness & Incompleteness : Papers on Algorithmic Information Theory. World Scientific Series in Computer Science. Vol. 8. (Teaneck, NJ, USA, Singapore, 1987).

[41] J.R. Pierce, An Introduction to Information Theory : Symbols, Signals & Noise 2nd, rev. ed. (Dover Publications, New York, 1980).

[42] C.E. Shannon and W. Weaver, The Mathematical Theory of Communication. (University of Illinois Press, Urbana, 1949).

[43] A.I. Goldman, Knowledge in a Social World. (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1999).

[44] C.E. Shannon, Collected Papers, ed. N.J.A. Sloane and A.D. Wyner. (IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamos, Ca:, 1993).

[45] S. Ryan. Wisdom. Stanford Encylopedia of Philosophy 2007 1/8/2008 [cited 2007 November 22]; Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/wisdom/.

[46] R. Nozick, What is wisdom and why do philosophers love it so? In: R. Nozick (ed.), The Examined Life, (Touchstone Press, New York, 1989).

EPrints dLIST, an open access archive for the Information Sciences, is supported by the School of Information Resources and Library Science and Learning Technologies Center, University of Arizona. Established in 2002, dLIST has a global Advisory Board and is a part of the Information Technology & Society Research Lab. Open Archives
Contact: Admin | Donate