Home | Browse | Search | Credits | About
Register | User Area | DL-Harvest | Help
DLIST

Information Science, Epistemology and the Knowledge Society. Invited speech, INFO 2008, Cuba. April 2008.

Hjørland, Birger (2008) Information Science, Epistemology and the Knowledge Society. Invited speech, INFO 2008, Cuba. April 2008.. In Proceedings INFO 2008, Cuba.

Full text available as:
Microsoft Powerpoint Presentation (.ppt) - Requires Microsoft Powerpoint

Abstract

The point of departure of this presentation is the challenges facing Information Science and the information profession. It provides a strategy for how to understand and address information problems and a vision about the role of information professionals in the Knowledge Society. The basic assumption is that any question put to a library or information service can be viewed from different perspectives and that the ability to identify, evaluate and negotiate different perspectives is the way advanced information services differentiate themselves from more primitive kinds of information services. Although it is technological advanced that IR-systems can retrieve documents based on, for example, combinations of words, are such systems primitive in relation to what is needed when information is searched. Knowledge itself is organized socially according to the social division of labour in society (e.g. in disciplines and trades). It is also organized intellectually into theories. Although facts exist, it is the best strategy for information science to assume the principle of fallibilism and to consider all knowledge as provisory and principally open to revision and modification. “Information” should thus be understood as “knowledge claims” produced on the basis of certain preunderstandings and interests. Information services should therefore not just communicate fragmented claims, but should contribute to the mapping of the structures in which knowledge is organized and also provide contextual information needed for evaluating specific knowledge claims. Different perspectives on a given issue tend to develop their own languages, genres, documents, citation patterns, symbolic systems and cultural products. By considering such connections may a lot of indicators be used to identify different perspectives on a given topic. The basic tasks for libraries and information science is to help users conceptualize and search for knowledge claims based on the understanding that any given claim is always produced from a specific perspective, which are often connected with specific social interests and with specific epistemological assumptions.

EPrint Type:Conference Paper
Subjects:Information Science
ID Code:2304
Deposited On:02 May 2008
Eprint Statistics:View statistics for this eprint
Tell A Colleague:Tell a colleague about it.

Abram, Stephen (2007). The social library 2.0. Presentation given at the Royal School of Library and Information Science in Copenhagen, on March 13, 2007. (24 MB). http://www.db.dk/bh/Core%20Concepts%20in%20LIS/articles%20a-z/Abram_2007_DB_Web_2.0.ppt

Bawden, D. (2007).  The doomsday of documentation? Journal of Documentation, 63(2), (editorial).

Borko, H. (1968). Information science: What is it? American Documentation, 19(1), 3-5.

Dillon, Andrew (2007). Library and information science as a research domain: problems and prospects. Information Research 12(4), paper colis03. http://informationr.net/ir/12-4/colis/colis03.html

Griffith, B. C. (1980). Key Papers in Information Science. New York: Knowledge Industry Publications.

Herring, Mark Youngblood (2007). Fool's Gold: Why the Internet Is No Substitute for a Library. McFarland & Company.

Hjørland, B. (2002). Epistemology and the Socio-Cognitive Perspective in Information Science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(4), 257-270.

Hjørland, Birger (2007). Arguments for 'the bibliographical paradigm'. Some thoughts inspired by the new English edition of the UDC. Information Research, 12(4) paper colis06. http://informationr.net/ir/12-4/colis/colis06.html

Narvaez-Berthelemot, N. & Russell, J. M. (2001). World distribution of social science journals: A view from the periphery. Scientometrics, 51(1), 223-239.

Olson, H. A. (2002). The Power to Name: Locating the Limits of Subject Representation in Libraries. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Talja, S,. Hartel, J. (2007). "Revisiting the user-centred turn in information science research: an intellectual history perspective" Information Research, 12(4) paper colis04. Available at http://InformationR.net/ir/12-4/colis/colis04.html

Volosinov, V. N. (1929/1986). Marxism and the philosophy of language. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. (Originally published in 1929; translated from Russian by L. Matejka and I. R. Titunik and published in English in 1986).

EPrints dLIST, an open access archive for the Information Sciences, is supported by the School of Information Resources and Library Science and Learning Technologies Center, University of Arizona. Established in 2002, dLIST has a global Advisory Board and is a part of the Information Technology & Society Research Lab. Open Archives
Contact: Admin | Donate