Home | Browse | Search | Credits | About
Register | User Area | DL-Harvest | Help
DLIST

Relevance and Success of IS Teaching and Research: An Analysis of the "Relevance Debate"

Schauer, Carola (2007) Relevance and Success of IS Teaching and Research: An Analysis of the "Relevance Debate". Technical Report 19, University of Duisburg-Essen, Institute for Computer Science and Business Information Systems.

Full text available as:
PDF - Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader or other PDF viewer.

Abstract

This report is part of a series of publications on the status and development of the North-American Information Systems (IS) field and Wirtschaftsinformatik (WI), its counterpart in German speaking countries. Information systems in businesses and organizations are the main subject of research in IS and WI. Hence, both disciplines are applied fields of research. Thus, the valuation of research results and graduates by business practice are vital indicators for the disciplines’ status and success. Between 1991 and 2001 a plethora of articles were published in leading Information Systems (IS) journals and conference proceedings addressing the issue of relevance of IS research and teaching. This research report provides a comprehensive content analysis of this „relevance debate“ in the North-American Information Systems field. The perceptions, opinions, and recommendations of the contributors are presented structured according to statements of valuation, perception, explanation, and recommendation. The reconstruction of the main IS relevance debate indicates that all debate participants agree that relevance to practice plays a vital role for the IS discipline, but that the field largely lacks relevance in terms of research as well as in terms of teaching. The lack of relevance is, for example, illustrated by the general perception that research results rarely impact practice and that IT/IS professionals usually do not read academic IS journals. In order to analyse if the debate has lead to any changes in terms of practice relevance of the IS field the most recent literature and studies available on IS relevance are evaluated. Analysis results indicate that no significant changes took place. But various IS researchers still report on problems in terms of acceptance and perception of IS degree programs and research. Based on the perspectives of experienced researchers from WI and other European IS communities the concluding remarks of this report attempt to explain the apparent lack of change in the North-American IS field and provide suggestions for improving the current status of the IS field in terms of relevance.

EPrint Type:Departmental Report
Keywords:wirtschaftsinformatik, relevance, business practice, teaching, research
Subjects:Information Systems
ID Code:2075
Deposited On:20 October 2007
Alternative Locations:http://www.icb.uni-due.de/fileadmin/ICB/research/research_reports/ICBReport19.pdf
Eprint Statistics:View statistics for this eprint
Tell A Colleague:Tell a colleague about it.

AACSB international (1997): Research Relevancy Remains a Challenge for Business Schools, Newsline, Spring

Alter, Steven (2001): Recognizing the Relevance of IS Research and Broadening the Appeal and Applicability of Future Publications, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 6, No. 1.

Amaravadi, Chandra S. (2991): Improving Consumption, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 6, No. 1.

Applegate, Lynda M.; King, John L. (1999): Rigor and Relevance: Careers on the Line, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 17 ff.

Avgerou, C.; Siemer, J.; Bjørn-Andersen, N. (1999): The academic field of information systems in Europe, European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 136-153.

Avison, David; Pries-Heje, Jan (eds.) (2005): Research in Information Systems – A handbook for research supervisors and their students, Elsevier, Information Systems Series.

Ben-Menachem, Mordechai (2001): IT/IS Management and Research Directions, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 6, No. 1.

Benbasat, I.; Weber, R. (1996): Research Commentary: Rethinking “Diversity” in IS Research, Information Systems Research, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 389-399.

Benbasat, Izak; Zmud, Robert W. (1999): Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 3-16.

Bhattacherjee, Anol (2001): Understanding and Evaluating Relevance in IS Research, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 6, No. 1.

Borchers, Andrew S. (2001): Adding Practitioner Scholars to Our Faculties, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 6, No. 1.

Benamati, J.; Serva, M.A;. Galletta, D.; Harris, A.; Niederman, F. (2006): The Slippery Slope Of MIS Academia: A Discussion Of The Quest For Relevance In Our Discipline, Communications of AIS, Vol. 18, Article 32.

Chatterjee, Samir (2001): Information Systems Research and Relevance, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 6, No. 1.

Cresswell, Anthony M. (2001): Thoughts on Relevance of IS Research, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 6, No. 1.

Dalal, Nikunj P. (2001): What Does It All Mean? A Meta-Inquiry, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 6, No. 1.

Davenport, Tom (1997): Think Tank – Storming the Ivory Tower, CIO Magazine, April 15.

Davenport, Thomas H and Markus, M. Lynne (1999): Rigor vs. Relevance Revisited: Response to Benbasat and Zmud, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 19 ff.

Desouza, K.C.; El Sawy, O.A.; Galliers, R.D.; Loebbecke, C.; Watson, R.T. (2006): Beyond Rigor and Relevance Towards Responsibility and Reverberation: Information Systems Research That Really Matters, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 17, pp. 341-353.

Dennis, Alan R. (2001): Relevance in Information Systems Research, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 6, No. 1.

Frank, U. (2006): Towards a Pluralistic Conception of Research Methods in Information Systems Research, ICB Research Reports, No. 7, Institute for Computer Science and Business Information Systems (ICB), University Duisburg-Essen.

Glass, Robert L. (2001): Rigor vs. Relevance: A Practitioner's Eye View of an Explosion of IS Opinions, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 6, No. 1.

Goldberg, Michael A.(1996): The Case Against "Practicality" and "Relevance" as Gauges of Business Schools: Responding to Challenges Posed by Criticisms of Business School Research, Journal of Management Inquiry, No. 5, pp. 336-349.

Gray, Paul (2001): Introduction to the special volume on relevance, Communications of the AIS, Vol. 6, Nor. 1, pp. 1-12.

Gray, Paul (2002): Relevance as a “unfulfilled promise”, presentation at ICIS 2001 panel, in Kock et al. (2002).

George, Joey F.; Valacich, Joseph S.; Valor, Josep (2005): Does Information Systems Still Matter? Lessons for a Maturing Discipline, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 219-232.

Heart, Tsipi; Pliskin, Nava (2001): Making Academic IS Research More Relevant to Industry Via Open-Architecture Models for Career Paths in Academia, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 6, No. 1.

Hildebrand, C. (1999): Needs Improvement - MBA Programs, CIO Enterprise, pp. 40-47.

Hirschheim, Rudy (1984): Information Systems Epistemology: An Historical Perspective, in Mumford, E.; Hirschheim, R. A.; Fitzgerald, G.; Wood-Harper, T. (eds.): Research Methods in Information Systems, Proceedings of the IFIP WG 8.2 Colloqium, Manchester Business School, 1-3. September 1984, pp. 9-33.

Hoving, Ray (2002): Commments on the presentations by Klein, Gray and Myers, discussion at ICIS 2001 panel, in Kock et al. (2002).

Ives, B.; Hamilton, S.; Davis, G. (1980): A framework for research in computer-based management information systems, Management Science, Vol. 26, No. 9, pp. 910-934.

Jennex, Murray E. (2001): Research Relevance-You Get What You Reward, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 6, No. 1.

Kavan, C. Bruce (1998): Profit through knowledge: The application of academic research to information technology, Information Resources Management Journal, Winter 1998, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 17-22.

Keen, Peter G.W. (1980): MIS Research: Reference Disciplines And A Cumulative Tradition, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Information Systems, pp. 9-18.

Keen, Peter G.W. (1991): Relevance and Rigor in Information Systems Research: Improving Quality, Confidence, Cohesion and Impact, In Nissen, H.-E.; Klein, H. K.; Hirschheim, R.: Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent traditions, North-Holland, Amsterdam et al., pp. 27-50.

Kock, N.; Gray, P.; Hoving, R.; Klein, H.; Myers, M.; Rockart, J. (2002): IS Research Relevance Revisited: Subtle Accomplishment, Unfulfilled Promise, or Serial Hypocrisy? In: Communications of the Association for Information Systems. Vol. 8, pp. 330-346.

King, J. L., Lyytinen, K. (2004): Reach and Grasp, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 539-551.

King, J. L. (1993): Editorial Notes, Information Systems Research, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 291-298.

Klein, Heinz (2002): Relevance as a “subtle accomplishment”, presentation at ICIS 2001 panel, in Kock et al. (2002).

Kohli, Rajiv (2001): Industry-Academia Interaction: Key to IT Relevance, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 6, No. 1.

Lange, Carola (2005a): Development and status of the Information Systems discipline: An interpretive evaluation of interviews with renowned researchers, Part I – Research Objectives and Method, ICB Research Reports No. 2, University Duisburg-Essen, Institute for Computer Science and Business Information Systems.

Lange, Carola (2005b): Development and Status of the Information Systems / Wirtschaftsinformatik Discipline - An Interpretive Evaluation of Interviews with Renowned Researchers: Part II - Results Information Systems Discipline, ICB - Research Reports, No. 3, University Duisburg-Essen, Institute for Computer Science and Business Information Systems.

Lange, Carola (2006): Entwicklung und Stand der Disziplinen Wirtschaftsinformatik und Information Systems – Interpretative Auswertung der Interviews: Teil III – Ergebnisse zur Wirtschaftsinformatik, ICB - Research Reports, No. 4, University Duisburg-Essen, Institute for Computer Science and Business Information Systems.

Lee, Allen S. (1999): Rigor and Relevance in MIS Research: Beyond the Approach of Positivism Alone, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 29 ff.

Lyytinen, Kalle (1999): Empirical Research in Information Systems: On the Relevance of Practice in Thinking of IS Research, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 25 ff.

Mathieson, Kieran; Ryan, Terry D. (2001): A Broader View of Relevance, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 6, No. 1.

Mason, Robert M. (2001): Not Either/Or: Research in Pasteur's Quadrant, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 6, No. 1.

Moody, D. L. (2000): Building links between IS research and professional practice: improving the relevance and impact of IS research. In Proceedings of the Twenty First international Conference on Information Systems (Brisbane, Queensland, Australia). International Conference on Information Systems. Association for Information Systems, Atlanta, GA, pp. 351-360.

Munkvold, Bjørn Erik; Khazanchi, Deepak (2001): Expanding the Notion of Relevance in IS Research: A Proposal and Some Recommendations, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 6, No. 1.

Myers, Michael (2002): Relevance as “serial hypocrisy”, presentation at ICIS 2001 panel, in Kock et al. (2002).

Olfman, Lorne (2001): We ARE Doing Relevant IS Research: It's The Truth, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 6, No. 1.

Paper, David J. (2001): IS Relevance: Are We Asking the Right Questions? , Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 6, No. 1.

Pfeffer, Jeffrey; Fong, Christina T. (2002): The End of Business Schools? Less Success Than Meets the Eye, Academy of Management Learning & Education, Vol. 1, No. 1.

Porter, L. W.; McKibbin, L. E. (1988): Management education and development: Drift or thrust into the 21st century. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Ramesh, Ram (2001): IS Relevance: Myth or Reality, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 6, No. 1.

Robey, D. (1996): Research Commentary: Diversity in Information Systems Research: Threat, Promise, and Responsibility, Information Systems Research, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 400-408.

Rockart, J. (2002a): Comments on the Presentations by Klein, Gary, and Myers, discussion at ICIS 2001 panel, in Kock et al. (2002).

Rockart, J. (2002b): Editor’s Comments, MISQ Executive, Vol. 1, No. 1.

Rollier, Bruce (2001): Information Systems Research: Reversing the Orientation, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 6, No. 1.

Robey, Daniel; Markus, M. Lynne (1998): Beyond rigor and relevance: Producing consumable research about information system, Information Resources Management Journal, Winter, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 7-16.

Saunders, C. S. (1998): The Role of Business in IT Research, Information Resources Management Journal, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 4-6.

Schmalensee, Richard (2006): Where's The "B" In B-Schools?, Business Week, November 27.

Sein, Maung K. (2001): The Relevance of IS Academic Research: Not As Good As It Can Get, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 6, No. 1.

Senn, J. (1998): The challenge of relating IS research to practice, Information Resources Management Journal, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 23-28.

Srivastava, Shirish C.; Theo, Thompson S. H. (2005): Relevance in Information Systems Research: An Empirical Analysis, Proceeding of the Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, pp. 1292-1304.

Truex III, Duane P. (2001): Three Issues Concerning Relevance in IS Research: Epistemology, Audience, and Method, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol.6, No. 1.

Watson, H. J.; Huber, M. W. (2000): Innovative ways to connect information systems programs to the business community. Communications of the AIS, Vol. 3, Article 11.

Weinberg, Paul (2001): Relevance of MIS Research to the Business Community, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 6, No. 1.

Westfall, Ralph D. (2001): Dare To Be Relevant, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 6, No. 1.

Westfall, Ralph (1999): An IS Research Relevancy Manifesto, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vo. 2, No. 1.

EPrints dLIST, an open access archive for the Information Sciences, is supported by the School of Information Resources and Library Science and Learning Technologies Center, University of Arizona. Established in 2002, dLIST has a global Advisory Board and is a part of the Information Technology & Society Research Lab. Open Archives
Contact: Admin | Donate