Home | Browse | Search | Credits | About
Register | User Area | DL-Harvest | Help
DLIST

Everything Old is New Again: Perspectivism and Polyhierarchy in Julius O. Kaiser’s Theory of Systematic Indexing

Dousa, Thomas (2007) Everything Old is New Again: Perspectivism and Polyhierarchy in Julius O. Kaiser’s Theory of Systematic Indexing . In Lussky, Joan, Eds. Proceedings 18th Workshop of the American Society for Information Science and Technology Special Interest Group in Classification Research, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

Full text available as:
Microsoft Word Document (.doc) - Requires Microsoft Word

Abstract

In the early years of the 20th century, Julius Otto Kaiser (1868–1927), a special librarian and indexer of technical literature, developed a method of knowledge organization (KO) known as systematic indexing. Certain elements of the method—its stipulation that all indexing terms be divided into fundamental categories “concretes”, “countries”, and “processes”, which are then to be synthesized into indexing “statements” formulated according to strict rules of citation order—have long been recognized as precursors to key principles of the theory of faceted classification. However, other, less well-known elements of the method may prove no less interesting to practitioners of KO. In particular, two aspects of systematic indexing seem to prefigure current trends in KO: (1) a perspectivist outlook that rejects universal classifications in favor of information organization systems customized to reflect local needs and (2) the incorporation of index terms extracted from source documents into a polyhierarchical taxonomical structure. Kaiser’s perspectivism anticipates postmodern theories of KO, while his principled use of polyhierarchy to organize terms derived from the language of source documents provides a potentially fruitful model that can inform current discussions about harvesting natural-language terms, such as tags, and incorporating them into a flexibly structured controlled vocabulary.

EPrint Type:Conference Paper
Keywords:Systematic indexing, Knowledge organization, Polyhierarchy, Perspectivism
Subjects:Indexing
ID Code:2062
Deposited On:25 October 2007
Eprint Statistics:View statistics for this eprint
Tell A Colleague:Tell a colleague about it.

Black, A. (2007). Enterprise and intelligence: the early company library in context. In A. Black, D. Muddiman, & H. Plant, The early information society: information management in Britain before the computer (pp. 149–185). Aldershot: Ashgate.

Broughton, V. (2004). Essential classification. New York: Neal-Schuman Publishers.

Broughton, V. (2006). The need for a faceted classification as the basis of all methods of information. Aslib Proceedings, 58(1–2), 49–72.

Chmielewska-Gorczycza, E. (1997). Polyhierarchy as a means of knowledge representation. In Knowledge organization for information retrieval: Proceedings of the Sixth International Study Conference on Classification Retrieval (FID 716; pp. 105–112). The Hague, NL: International Federation for Information and Documents.

Ellis, D., & Vasconcelos, A. (1999). Ranganathan and the Net: using facet analysis to search and organize the World Wide Web. Aslib Proceedings, 51(1), 3–10.

Foskett, A. C. (1976). E. J. Coates, The British Technology Index and the theory of subject headings: the man who loved cat springing. In W. B. Rayward (ed.), The variety of librarianship: essays in honour of John Wallace Metcalfe (pp. 77–99). Sydney: Library Association of Australia.

Hjørland, B. (2002). Domain analysis in information science: Eleven approaches—traditional as well as innovative. Journal of Documentation, 58(4), 422–462.

Hjørland, B. (2004). Domain analysis: a socio-cognitive orientation for information science research. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 30(3), 17–21.

Hjørland, B., & Pedersen, K. N. (2005). A substantive theory of classification for information retrieval. Journal of Documentation, 61(5), 582–597.

Holmstrom, J. E. (1947). Records and research in engineering and industrial science (2nd ed.). London: Chapman & Hall.

Kaiser, J. O. (1908). The card system at the office. London: McCorquodale & Co.

Kaiser, J. O. (1911). Systematic indexing. London: Isaac Pitman & Sons.

Kaiser, J. O. (1926). Systematic indexing. In The Association of Special Libraries and Information Bureaux, Report of Proceedings of the Third Conference held at Balliol College, Oxford, September 24th–27th, 1926 (pp. 20–44). London: the Association.

Kroski, E. (2005). The hive mind: folksonomies and user-based tagging. Retrieved August 28, 2007, from http://infotangle.blogsome.com/2005/12/07/the-hive-mind-folksonomies-and-user-based-tagging

La Barre, K. (2004). Adventures in faceted classification: a brave new world or a world of confusion? In I. C. McIlwaine (ed.), Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of the International Society for Knowledge Organization, University College London, 13–16 July, 2004. (Advances in Knowledge Organization, vol. 9; pp. 79–84). Würzburg: Ergon.

La Barre, K. (2007). The heritage of early FC in document reference retrieval systems, 1920–1969, Library History, 23(2), 129–143.

Mai, J.-E. (1999). A postmodern theory of knowledge organization. In L. Woods (ed.), ASIS ’99: Proceedings of the 62nd ASIS Annual Meeting, Washington DC, October 31–November 4, 1999. Knowledge: Creation, Organization and Use (pp. 547–555). Medford, NJ: Published for the American Society for Information Science.

Mai, J.-E. (2004a). Classification of the Web: challenges and inquiries. Knowledge Organization, 31(2), 92–97.

Mai, J.-E. (2004b). Classification in context: relativity, reality, and representation. Knowledge Organization, 31(1), 39–48.

Merholz, P. (2004). Metadata for the masses. Retrieved August 27, 2007, from http://www.adaptivepath.com/ideas/essays/archives/000361.php

Metcalfe, J. (1957). Information indexing and subject cataloging, Alphabetical: Classified: Coordinate: Mechanical. New York: The Scarecrow Press.

Metcalfe, J. (1959). Subject classifying and indexing of libraries and literature. New York: The Scarecrow Press.

Metcalfe, J. (1976). Information retrieval, British and American, 1876–1976. Metuchen, NJ: The Scarecrow Press.

Miksa, F. L. (1998). The DDC, the universe of knowledge, and the post-modern library. Albany, NY: Forest Press.

Morville, P. (2005). Ambient findability. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.

Morville, P. & Rosenfeld, L. (2007). Information architecture for the World Wide Web (3rd ed.). Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.

NISO (2005). Guidelines for the construction, format, and management of monolingual controlled vocabularies (ANSI-NISO Z39.19-2005). Bethesda, MD: NISO Press.

Noruzi, A. (2007). Editorial. Webology, 4(2), editorial 12. Retrieved August 28, 2007, from http://

www.webology.ir/2007/v4n2/editorial12.html

Quintarelli, E. (2005). Folksonomies: power to the people. Paper presented at the ISKO Italy-UniMIB meeting, Milan, June 24, 2005. Retrieved August 28, 2007, from http://www.iskoi.org/doc/folksonomies.htm.

Quintarelli, E. (2006). Folksonomies 2.0 – the chaotic order. Retrieved September 7, 2007, from http://www.infospaces.it/wordpress/topics/information-architecture/74

Quintarelli, E., Rosati, L., & Resmini, A. (2006). Facetag: integrating bottom-up and top-down classification in a social tagging system. Paper presented at the Euro IA Conference, 2006, Berlin. Retrieved September 7, 2007, from http://www.facetag.org/download/facetag.pdf

Rafferty, P. (2001). The representation of knowledge in library classification schemes. Knowledge Organization, 28(4), 180–191.

Rodríguez, R. D. (1982). Kaiser’s systematic indexing. Library Resources & Technical Services, 28(2), 163–174.

Shirky, C. (2005). Ontology is overrated: categories, links, and tags. Retrieved August 13, 2007, from http://shirky.com/writings/ontology_overrated.html

Svenonius, E. (1978). Facet definition: a case study. International Classification, 5(3), 134–141.

Svenonius, E. (2000). The intellectual foundation of information organization. Cambridge, MA/London, UK: MIT Press.

Vickery, B. (1999). A century of scientific and technical information. Journal of Documentation, 55(5), 476–527.

Weinberger, D. (2007). Everything is miscellaneous: the power of the new digital disorder. New York: Henry Holt & Co.

Williamson, N. J. (2000). Thesauri in the digital age: stability and dynamism in their development and use. In C. Beghtol, L. C. Horwarth, & N. Williamson (eds.), Dynamism and stability in knowledge organization. Proceedings of the Sixth International ISKO Conference (Advances in Knowledge Organization, vol. 7; pp. 268–274). Würzburg: Ergon.

EPrints dLIST, an open access archive for the Information Sciences, is supported by the School of Information Resources and Library Science and Learning Technologies Center, University of Arizona. Established in 2002, dLIST has a global Advisory Board and is a part of the Information Technology & Society Research Lab. Open Archives
Contact: Admin | Donate