Home | Browse | Search | Credits | About
Register | User Area | DL-Harvest | Help
DLIST

Credibility: A Multidisciplinary Framework

Rieh, Soo Young and Danielson, David (2007) Credibility: A Multidisciplinary Framework, in Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, pages pp. 307-364. Information Today.

Full text available as:
PDF - Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader or other PDF viewer.

Abstract

This chapter reviews the theoretical and empirical literature on the concept of credibility and its areas of application relevant to information science and technology, encompassing several disciplinary approaches.

EPrint Type:Book Chapter
Keywords:information credibility, information quality, cognitive authority, web credibility
Subjects:Information Seeking Behaviors
ID Code:1899
Deposited On:30 May 2007
Eprint Statistics:View statistics for this eprint
Tell A Colleague:Tell a colleague about it.

Abels, E. G., White, M. D., & Hahn, K. (1997). Identifying user-based criteria for Web pages. Internet Research, 7, 252–262.

Abels, E. G., White, M. D., & Hahn, K. (1998). A user-based design process for Web sites. Internet Research, 8, 39–48.

Adaval, R. (2003). How good gets better and bad gets worse: Understanding the impact of affect on evaluations of known brands. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 352–367.

Agosto, D. E. (2002a). A model of young people’s decision-making in using the Web. Library & Information Science Research, 24, 311–341.

Agosto, D. E. (2002b). Bounded rationality and satisficing in young people’s Web-based decision making. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53, 16–27.

Alexander, J. E., & Tate, M. A. (1999). Web wisdom: How to evaluate and create information quality on the Web. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Amento, B., Terveen, L., & Hill, W. (2000). Does “authority” mean quality? Predicting expert quality ratings of Web documents. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 296–303.

Anand, B. N., & Shachar, R. (2004). Brands as beacons: A new source of loyalty to multiproduct firms. Journal of Marketing Research, 41, 135–150.

Anderson, E. T., & Simester, D. I. (1998). The role of sale signs. Marketing Science, 17, 139–155.

Anderson, E. T., & Simester, D. I. (2001). Are sale signs effective when more products have them? Marketing Science, 20, 121–142.

Andrews, L. W., & Gutkin, T. B. (1991). The effects of human versus computer authorship on consumers’ perceptions of psychological reports. Computers in Human Behavior, 7, 311–317.

Annenberg School Center for the Digital Future. (2004). The digital future report: Surveying the digital future: Year four. Los Angeles: University of Southern California.

Anthony, D., Smith, S. W., & Williamson, T. (2005). Explaining quality in Internet collective goods: Zealots and good Samaritans in the case of Wikipedia. Retrieved February 2, 2006, from http://www2.scedu.unibo.it/roversi/Blog/anthony.pdf

Arnold, J. M., & Jayne, E. A. (1998). Dangling by a slender thread: The lessons and implications of teaching the World Wide Web to freshmen. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 24, 43–52.

Association of College and Research Libraries. (2000). Information literacy competency standards for higher education. Chicago: American Library Association. Retrieved February 2, 2006, from http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlstandards/standards.pdf

Austin, E. W., & Dong, Q. (1994). Source v. content effects on judgments of news believability. Journalism Quarterly, 71, 973–983.

Bai, B., Ng, K. B., Sun, Y., Kantor, P., & Strzalkowski, T. (2004). The institutional dimension of document quality judgments. Proceedings of the 67th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 110–118.

Baker, L., Wagner, T. H., Singer, S., & Bundorf, M. K. (2003). Use of the Internet and e-mail for health care information. Journal of the American Medical Association, 289, 2400–2406.

Barry, C. L. (1994). User-defined relevance criteria: An exploratory study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45, 149–159.

Barry, C. L., & Schamber, L. (1998). Users’ criteria for relevance evaluation: A cross-situational comparison. Information Processing & Management, 34, 219–236.

Bateman, J. (1998). Modeling changes in end-user relevance criteria: An information seeking study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Texas.

Bateman, J. (1999). Modeling the importance of end-user relevance criteria. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 396–406.

Benotsch, E. G., Kalichman, S., & Weinhardt, L. S. (2004). HIV-AIDS patients’ evaluation of health information on the Internet: The digital divide and vulnerability to fraudulent claims. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 1004–1011.

Berland, G. K., Elliott, M. N., Morales, L. S., Algazy, J. I., Kravitz, R. L., Broder, M. S., et al. (2001). Health information on the Internet: Accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 2612–2621.

Bickart, B., & Schindler, R. M. (2001). Internet forums as influential sources of consumer information. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 15, 31–40.

Biros, D. P., Fields, G., & Gunsch, G. (2003). The effect of external safeguards on human–information system trust in an information warfare environment. Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Retrieved March 22, 2006, from http://csdl2.computer.org/comp/proceedings/hicss/2003/1874/02/187420062b.pdf

Biros, D. P., George, J. F., & Zmud, R. W. (2002). Inducing sensitivity to deception in order to improve decision making performance: A field study. MIS Quarterly, 26, 119–144.

Biswas, D., & Biswas, A. (2004). The diagnostic role of signals in the context of perceived risks in online shopping: So signals matter more on the Web? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18, 30–45.

Brin, S., & Page, L. (1998). The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine. Proceedings of the 7th International World Wide Web Conference. Retrieved February 2, 2006, from http://www7.scu.edu.au/programme/fullpapers/1921/com1921.htm

Brown, D., & Jones, D. R. (1998). Factors that influence reliance on decision aids: A model and an experiment. Journal of Information Systems, 12, 75–94.

Brown, S. P., Homer, P. M., & Inman, J. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of relationships between ad-evoked feelings and advertising responses. Journal of Marketing Research, 35, 114–126.

Burbules, N. C. (2001). Paradoxes of the Web: The ethical dimensions of credibility. Library Trends, 49, 441–453.

Buschman, J., & Warner, D. A. (2005). Researching and shaping information literacy initiatives in relation to the Web: Some framework problems and needs. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 31, 12–18.

Case, R. (2003). Making critical thinking an integral part of electronic research. School Libraries in Canada, 22(4), 13–16.

Casebeer, L., Bennett, N., Kristofco, R., Carillo, A., & Centor, R. (2002). Physician Internet medical information seeking and on-line continuing education use patterns. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 22, 33–42.

Choi, S. M., & Rifon, N. J. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of Web advertising credibility: A study of consumer response to banner ads. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 3(1). Retrieved February 2, 2006, from http://www.jiad.org/vol3/no1/choi/index.htm

Clark, D. B., & Slotta, J. D. (2000). Evaluating media-enhancement and source authority on the Internet: The Knowledge Integration Environment. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 859–871.

Cooke, A. (1999). Authoritative guide to evaluating information on the Internet. New York: Neal-Schuman.

Cool, C., Belkin, N. J., Frieder, O., & Kantor, P. (1993). Characteristics of texts affecting relevance judgments. Proceedings of the 14th National Online Meeting, 77–84.

Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organization design. Research in Organizational Behavior, 6, 191–233.

D’Angelo, B. J. (2001). Using source analysis to promote critical thinking. Research Strategies, 18, 303–309.

Danielson, D. R. (2005). Web credibility. In C. Ghaoui (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human–computer interaction (pp. 713–721). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.

Darby, M. R., & Karni, E. (1973). Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud. Journal of Law and Economics, 16, 67–88.

Darley, W. K., & Smith, R. E. (1993). Advertising claim objectivity: Antecedents and effects. Journal of Marketing, 57, 100–113.

Daugherty, T., Li, H., & Biocca, F. (2001). Consumer learning and 3-D ecommerce: The effects of sequential exposure of a virtual experience relative to indirect and direct product experience on product knowledge, brand attitude and purchase intention. In F. Biocca, H. Li, P. David, S. Edwards, & T. Daugherty (Eds.), Proceedings of the Experiential E-commerce Conference [CD-ROM]. East Lansing: M.I.N.D. Lab, Michigan State University.

Davis, E., Kay, J., & Star, J. (1991). Is advertising rational? Business Strategy Review, 2, 1–23.

Dholakia, R. R., & Sternthal, B. (1977). Highly credible sources: Persuasive facilitators or persuasive liabilities. Journal of Consumer Research, 3, 223–232.

Dijkstra, J. J. (1995). The influence of an expert system on the user’s view: How to fool a lawyer. New Review of Applied Expert Systems, 1, 123–138.

Dijkstra, J. J. (1999). User agreement with incorrect expert system advice. Behaviour & Information Technology, 18, 399–411.

Dijkstra, J. J., Liebrand, W. B., & Timminga, E. (1998). Persuasiveness of expert systems. Behaviour & Information Technology, 17, 155–163.

Dragulanescu, N. (2002). Website quality evaluations: Criteria and tools. International Information & Library Review, 34, 247–254.

Dutton, W. H., Gennaro, C., & Hargrave, A. M. (2005). The Internet in Britain: The Oxford Internet survey. Oxford, UK: Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford.

Earley, P. C. (1988). Computer-generated performance feedback in the magazine-subscription industry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41, 50–64.

Eastin, M. S. (2001). Credibility assessments of online health information: The effects of source expertise and knowledge of content. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(4). Retrieved February 2, 2006, from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol6/issue4/eastin.html

Edwards, G., Kang, B. H., Preston, P., & Compton, P. (1995). Prudent expert systems with credentials: Managing the expertise of decision support systems. International Journal of Bio-Medical Computing, 40, 125–132.

Erdem, T., & Swait, J. (2004). Brand credibility, brand consideration, and choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 191–198.

Escoffery, C., Miner, K. R., Adame, D. D., Butler, S., McCormick, L., & Mendell, E. (2005). Internet use for health information among college students. Journal of American College Health, 53(4), 183–188.

Eysenbach, G., & Diepgen, T. L. (1998). Towards quality management of medical information on the Internet: Evaluation, labelling, and filtering of information. British Medical Journal, 317, 1496–1502.

Eysenbach, G., & Köhler, C. (2002). How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the World Wide Web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews. British Medical Journal, 324, 573–577.

Eysenbach, G., Powell, J., Kuss, O., & Sa, E.-R. (2002). Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the World Wide Web: A systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Association, 287, 2691–2700.

Fallis, D. (2004). On verifying the accuracy of information: Philosophical perspectives. Library Trends, 52, 463–487.

Fallis, D. (2006). Social epistemology and information science. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 40, 475–519.

Fallis, D., & Frické, M. (2002). Verifiable health information on the Internet. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 43, 262–269.

Fallows, D. (2004). The Internet and Daily Life. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved February 2, 2006, from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Internet_and_Daily_Life.pdf

Fallows, D. (2005). Search engine users: Internet searchers are confident, satisfied and trusting—but they are also unaware and naïve. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved February 2, 2006, from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Searchengine_users.pdf

Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Fidel, R., Davies, R. K., Douglass, M. H., Holder, J. K., Hopkins, C. J., Kushner, E. J., et al. (1999). A visit to the information mall: Web searching behavior of high school students. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50, 24–37.

Flake, W. L. (1991). Influence of gender, dogmatism, and risk-taking propensity upon attitudes toward information from computers. Computers in Human Behavior, 7, 227–235.

Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2000). Perceptions of Internet information credibility. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 515–540.

Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2003). The perceived credibility of personal Web page information as influenced by the sex of the source. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 683–701.

Fogg, B. J. (2002). Stanford guidelines for Web credibility. Stanford Persuasive Technology Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved February 2, 2006, from http://www.webcredibility.org/guidelines

Fogg, B. J. (2003a). Persuasive technology: Using computers to change what we think and do. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.

Fogg, B. J. (2003b). Prominence-interpretation theory: Explaining how people assess credibility online. CHI ’03 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 722–723.

Fogg, B. J., Marshall, J., Kameda, T., Solomon, J., Rangnekar, A., Boyd, J., et al. (2001). Web credibility research: A method for online experiments and early study results. CHI ’01 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 295–296.

Fogg, B. J., Marshall, J., Laraki, O., Osipovich, A., Varma, C., Fang, N., Paul, J., et al. (2001). What makes Web sites credible? A report on a large quantitative study. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 61–68.

Fogg, B. J., Marshall, J., Osipovich, A., Varma, C., Laraki, O., Fang, N., et al. (2000). Elements that affect Web credibility: Early results from a self-report study. CHI ’00 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 287–288.

Fogg, B. J., Soohoo, C., Danielson, D. R., Marable, L., Stanford, J., & Tauber, E. R. (2003). How do users evaluate the credibility of Web sites? A study with over 2,500 participants. Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Designing for User Experiences (DUX’03). Retrieved April 1, 2006, from http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=997097&coll=ACM&dl=ACM&CFID=36236037&CFTOKEN=18606069

Fogg, B. J., & Tseng, H. (1999). The elements of computer credibility. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 80–87.

Ford, G. T., Smith, D. B., & Swazy, J. L. (1990). Consumer skepticism of advertising claims: Testing hypotheses from economics of information. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 433–441.

Fox, S. (2005). Health information online. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved February 2, 2006, from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Healthtopics_May05.pdf

Fragale, A. R., & Heath, C. (2004). Evolving information credentials: The (mis)attribution of believable facts to credible sources. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 225–236.

Freeman, K. S., & Spyridakis, J. H. (2004). An examination of factors that affect the credibility of online health information. Technical Communication, 51, 239–263.

Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 1–31.

Fritch, J. W., & Cromwell, R. L. (2001). Evaluating Internet resources: Identity, affiliation, and cognitive authority in a networked world. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52, 499–507.

Gardner, R. M., & Lundsgaarde, H. P. (1994). Evaluation of user acceptance of a clinical expert system. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 1, 428–438.

Goldberg, M. E., & Hartwick, J. (1990). The effects of advertiser reputation and extremity of advertising claim on advertising effectiveness. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 172–179.

Graefe, G. (2003). Incredible information on the Internet: Biased information provision and lack of credibility as a cause of insufficient information quality. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Information Quality, 133–146.

Graham, L., & Metaxas, P. T. (2003). "Of course it’s true: I saw it on the Internet!" Critical thinking in the Internet era. Communications of the ACM, 46(5), 71–75.

Gray, N. J., Klein, J. D., Noyce, P. R., Sesselberg, T. S., & Cantrill, J. A. (2005). Health information-seeking behavior in adolescence: The place of the Internet. Social Science & Medicine, 60, 1467–1478.

Gregor, S., & Benbasat, I. (1999). Explanations from intelligent systems: Theoretical foundations and implications for practice. MIS Quarterly, 23, 497–530.

Grewal, D., Marmorstein, H., & Sharma, A. (1996). Communicating price information through semantic cues: The moderating effects of situation and discount size. Journal of Consumer Research, 23, 148–155.

Groot, D., ter Riet, G., Khan, K. S., & Misso, K. (2001). Comparison of search strategies and quality of medical information of the Internet: A study relating to ankle sprain. International Journal of the Care of the Injured, 32, 473–476.

Haddow, G. (2003). Focusing on health information: How to assess information quality on the Internet. Australian Library Journal, 52, 169–177.

Hardey, M. (2001). ‘E-health’: The Internet and the transformation of patients into consumers and producers of health knowledge. Information, Communication, and Society, 4, 388–405.

Hogarth, R. M. (1987). Judgment and choice: The psychology of decision (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

Holbrook, M. B. (1978). Beyond attitude structure. Journal of Marketing Research, 15, 546–556.

Honaker, L. M., Hector, V. S., & Harrell, T. H. (1986). Perceived validity of computer- versus clinician-generated MMPI reports. Computers in Human Behavior, 2, 77–83.

Hong, T. (2006). The influence of structural and message features on Web site credibility. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57, 114–127.

Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15, 635–650.

Huerta, E. (2003). The credibility of online information. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Claremont Graduate University, CA.

Infante, D. A., Parker, K. R., Clarke, C. H., Wilson, L., & Nathu, I. A. (1983). A comparison of factor and functional approaches to source credibility. Communication Quarterly, 31, 43–48.

Ivory, M. Y., & Hearst, M. A. (2002). Statistical profiles of highly-rated Web sites. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 367–374.

Janes, J. W., & Rosenfeld, L. B. (1996). Networked information retrieval and organization: Issues and questions. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47, 711–715.

Jiang, J. J., Klein, G., & Vedder, R. G. (2000). Persuasive expert systems: The influence of confidence and discrepancy. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 99–109.

Jiang, J. J., Muhanna, W. A., & Pick, R. A. (1996). The impact of model performance on users’ confidence in decision models: An experimental examination. Computers in Human Behavior, 12, 193–207.

Johnson, T. J., & Kaye, B. K. (1998). Cruising is believing? Comparing Internet and traditional sources on media credibility measures. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 75, 325–340.

Johnson, T. J., & Kaye, B. K. (2000). Using is believing: The influence of reliance on the credibility of online political information among politically interested Internet users. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 865–879.

Johnson, T. J., & Kaye, B. K. (2002). Webelievability: A path model examining how convenience and reliance predict online credibility. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 79, 619–642.

Kapoun, J. (1998). Teaching undergrads Web evaluation: A guide for library instruction. College & Research Library News, 59, 522–523.

Kihlstrom, R. E., & Riordan, M. H. (1984). Advertising as a signal. Journal of Political Economy, 92, 427–450.

Kim, J., & Moon, J. (1998). Designing towards emotional usability in customer interfaces: Trustworthiness of cyber-banking system interfaces. Interacting with Computers, 10, 1–29.

Kiousis, S. (2001). Public trust or mistrust? Perceptions of media credibility in the information age. Mass Communication & Society, 4, 381–403.

Kirmani, A., & Rao, A. R. (2000). No pain, no gain: A critical review of the literature on signaling unobservable product quality. Journal of Marketing, 64, 66–79.

Kjartansdóttir, A., & Widenius, M. (1995). The quality of business information on the Internet: Evaluation criteria applicable to Internet resources. Swedish Library Research, 3–4, 43–50.

Klein, L. R. (1998). Evaluating the potential of interactive media through a new lens: Search versus experience goods. Journal of Business Research, 41, 195–203.

Klein, L. R. (2003). Creating virtual product experiences: The role of telepresence. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 17, 41–55.

Kleinberg, J. M. (1999). Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 46, 604–632.

Kluger, A. N., & Adler, S. (1993). Person- versus computer-mediated feedback. Computers in Human Behavior, 9, 1–16.

Koester, R., & Luthans, F. (1979). The impact of the computer on the choice activity of decision makers: A replication with actual users of computerized MIS. Academy of Management Journal, 22, 416–422.

Kopalle, P. K., & Assunção, J. L. (2000). When (not) to indulge in ‘puffery’: The role of consumer expectations and brand goodwill in determining advertised and actual product quality. Managerial and Decision Economics, 21, 223–241.

Kottemann, J. E., Davis, F. D., & Remus, W. E. (1994). Computer-assisted decision making: Performance, beliefs, and the illusion of control. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57, 26–37.

Lamberti, D. M., & Wallace, W. A. (1990). Intelligent interface design: An empirical assessment of knowledge presentation in expert systems. MIS Quarterly, 14, 279–311.

Landsbergen, D., Coursey, D. H., Loveless, S., & Shangraw, R. F. (1997). Decision quality, confidence, and commitment with expert systems: An experimental study. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7, 131–157.

Leckie, G. J. (1996). Desperately seeking citations: Uncovering faculty assumptions about the undergraduate research process. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 22, 201–208.

Lerch, F. J., Prietula, M. J., & Kulik, C. T. (1997). The Turing effect: The nature of trust in expert systems advice. In P. Feltovich, K. Ford, & R. Hoffman (Eds.), Expertise in context: Human and machine (pp. 417–448). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.

Licciardone, J. C., Smith-Barbaro, P., & Coleridge, S. T. (2001). Use of the Internet as a resource for consumer health information: Results of the second osteopathic survey of health care in America (OSTEOSURV-II). Journal of Medical Internet Research, 3, e31.

Lih, A. (2004, April). Wikipedia as participatory journalism: Reliable sources? Metrics for evaluating collaborative media as a news resource. Paper presented at the 5th International Symposium on Online Journalism, Austin, TX. Retrieved February 2, 2006, from http://jmsc.hku.hk/faculty/alih/publications/utaustin-2004-wikipedia-rc2.pdf

Liu, B., Harper, D. J., & Watt, S. (2005). Information sharing through rational links and viewpoint retrieval. Proceedings of the 28th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 639–640.

Liu, Y., Wang, C., Zhang, M., & Ma, S. (2005). Web data cleansing for information retrieval using key resource page selection. Proceedings of the 14th International World Wide Web Conference, 1136–1137.

Liu, Z. (2004). Perceptions of credibility of scholarly information on the Web. Information Processing & Management, 40, 1027–1038.

Liu, Z., & Huang, X. (2005). Evaluating the credibility of scholarly information on the Web: A cross cultural study. International Information & Library Review, 37, 99–106.

Luo, W., & Najdawi, M. (2004). Trust-building measures: A review of consumer health portals. Communications of the ACM, 47(1), 109–113.

Luthans, F., & Koester, R. (1976). The impact of computer generated information on the choice activity of decision-makers. Academy of Management Journal, 19, 328–332.

Mackenzie, S. B. (1986). The role of attention in mediating the effect of advertising on attribute importance. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 174–195.

Maglaughlin, K. L., & Sonnenwald, D. H. (2002). User perspectives on relevance criteria: A comparison among relevant, partially relevant, and not-relevant judgments. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53, 327–342.

Marchionini, G. (1995). Information seeking in electronic environments. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Marsh, S., & Dibben, M. R. (2003). The role of trust in information science and technology. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37, 465–498.

Marton, C. (2003). Quality of health information on the Web: User perceptions of relevance and reliability. The New Review of Information Behaviour Research, 4, 195–206.

Mashek, J. W., McGill, L. T., & Powell, A. C. (1997). Lethargy ’96: How the media covered a listless campaign. Arlington, VA: The Freedom Forum.

McCroskey, J. C., & Young, T. J. (1981). Ethos and credibility: The construct and its measurement after three decades. The Central States Speech Journal, 32, 24–34.

McGuigan, G. S. (2001). Databases vs. the Web: A discussion of teaching the use of electronic resources in the library instruction setting. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 6(1), 39–47.

McKenzie, P. J. (2003). Justifying cognitive authority decisions: Discursive strategies of information seekers. Library Quarterly, 73, 261–288.

Mehta, U. (2000). On the World Wide Web: Where are you going, where have you been? Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 5(1), 51–66.

Meola, M. (2004). Chucking the checklist: A contextual approach to teaching undergraduates Web-site evaluation. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 4, 331–344.

Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., Eyal, K., Lemus, D. R., & McCann, R. M. (2003). Credibility for the 21st century: Integrating perspectives on source, message, and media credibility in the contemporary media environment. In P. J. Kalbfleisch (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 27, pp. 293–335). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., & Zwarun, L. (2003). College student Web use, perceptions of information credibility, and verification behavior. Computers & Education, 41, 271–290.

Meyer, P. (1988). Defining and measuring credibility of newspapers: Developing an index. Journalism Quarterly, 65, 567–574.

Meyer, T. J. (1974). Media credibility: The state of the research. Public Telecommunications Reviews, 19(4), 48–52.

Meyvis, T., & Janiszewski, C. (2002). Consumers’ beliefs about product benefits: The effect of obviously irrelevant product information. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 618–635.

Mizzaro, S. (1997). Relevance: The whole history. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48, 810–832.

Morahan-Martin, J. M. (2004). How Internet users find, evaluate, and use online health information: A cross-cultural review. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7, 497–510.

Morrison, J. L., & Stein, L. L. (1999). Assuring integrity of information utility in cyber-learning formats. Reference Services Review, 27, 317–326.

Muir, B. M. (1987). Trust between humans and machines, and the design of decision aids. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 27, 527–539.

Mulder, R. (1980). Media credibility: A use-gratifications approach. Journalism Quarterly, 57, 474–477.

Murphy, D. S., & Yetmar, S. A. (1996). Auditor evidence evaluation: Expert systems as credible sources. Behaviour & Information Technology, 15, 14–23.

Nass, C., & Brave, S. (2005). Wired for speech: How voice activates and advances the human–computer relationship. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Nass, C., & Mason, L. (1990). On the study of technology and task: A variable-based approach. In J. Fulk & C. Steinfeld (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 46–67). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Nelson, P. (1970). Information and consumer behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 78, 311–329.

Nelson, P. (1974). Advertising as information. Journal of Political Economy, 82, 729–754.

Newhagen, J., & Nass, C. (1989). Differential criteria for evaluating credibility of newspapers and TV news. Journalism Quarterly, 66, 277–284.

O’Donovan, J., & Smyth, B. (2005). Trust in recommender systems. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, 167–174.

Olaisen, J. (1990). Information quality factors and the cognitive authority of electronic information. In I. Wormell (Ed.), Information quality: Definitions and dimensions (pp. 91–121). Los Angeles: Taylor Graham.

Pancer, S. M., George, M., & Gebotys, R. J. (1992). Understanding and predicting attitudes toward computers. Computers in Human Behavior, 8, 211–222.

Parekh, S. G., Nazarian, D. G., & Lim, C. K. (2004). Adoption of information technology by resident physicians. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, 421, 107–111.

Park, T. K. (1993). The nature of relevance in information retrieval: An empirical study. Library Quarterly, 63, 318–351.

Peterson, G., Aslani, P., & Williams, K. A. (2003). How do consumers search for and appraise information on medicines on the Internet? A qualitative study using focus groups. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 5(4). Retrieved February 2, 2006, from http://www.jmir.org/2003/4/e33

Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, IA: W. C. Brown.

Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123–205.

Pornpitakpan, C. (2004). The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades’ evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 243–281.

Pratt, G. F., Flannery, P., & Perkins, C. L. D. (1996). Guidelines for Internet resource selection. College & Research Library News, 57, 134–135.

Price, S. L., & Hersh, W. R. (1999). Filtering Web pages for quality indicators: An empirical approach to finding high quality consumer health information on the World Wide Web. Proceedings of the 1999 Annual Symposium of the American Medical Informatics Association, 911–915.

Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Quintana, Y., Feightner, J. W., Wathen, C. N., Sangster, L. M., & Marshall, J. N. (2001). Preventive health information on the Internet: Qualitative study of consumers’ perspectives. Canadian Family Physician, 47, 1759–1765.

Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Resnick, P., & Varian, H. R. (1997). Recommender systems. Communications of the ACM, 40(3), 56–58.

Rieh, S. Y. (2000). Information quality and cognitive authority in the World Wide Web. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey.

Rieh, S. Y. (2002). Judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53, 145–161.

Rieh, S. Y. (2005). Cognitive authority. In K. E. Fisher, S. Erdelez, & E. F. McKechnie (Eds.), Theories of information behavior: A researcher’s guide (pp. 83–87). Medford, NJ: Information Today.

Rieh, S. Y., & Belkin, N. J. (1998). Understanding judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the WWW. Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 279–289.

Rieh, S. Y., & Belkin, N. J. (2000). Interaction on the Web: Scholars’ judgment of information quality and cognitive authority. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 25–38.

Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: The Free Press.

Roper, B. (1985). Public attitudes toward television and other media in a time of change. New York: Television Information Office.