Home | Browse | Search | Credits | About
Register | User Area | DL-Harvest | Help
DLIST

Is the United States losing ground in science? A global perspective on the world science system in 2005

Leydesdorff, Loet and Wagner, Caroline S. (2006) Is the United States losing ground in science? A global perspective on the world science system in 2005 .

Full text available as:
PDF - Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader or other PDF viewer.
HTML

Abstract

Based on the Science Citation Index–Expanded web-version, the USA is still by far the strongest nation in terms of scientific performance. Its relative decline in percentage share of publications is largely due to the emergence of China and other Asian nations. In terms of citations, the competitive advantage of the American “domestic market” is diminished, while the European Union (EU) is profiting more from the enlargement of the database over time than the US. However, the USA is still outperforming all other countries in terms of highly cited papers and citation/publication ratios, and it is more successful than the EU in coordinating its research efforts in strategic priority areas like nanotechnology. In this field, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has become second largest in 2005 in both numbers of papers published and citations behind the USA.

EPrint Type:Preprint
Keywords:national, science, bibliometrics, indicators, nanotechnology
Subjects:Science Technology Studies
ID Code:1659
Deposited On:17 November 2006
Alternative Locations:http://www.leydesdorff.net/us_science/index.htm, http://www.leydesdorff.net/us_science/us_science.pdf
Eprint Statistics:View statistics for this eprint
Tell A Colleague:Tell a colleague about it.

Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A., 1991. The bibliometric assessment of UK scientific performance—some comments on Martin’s reply. Scientometrics, 20, 359-362.

Braun, T., Schubert, A., Zsindely, S., 1997. Nanoscience and nanotechnology on the balance. Scientometrics, 38, 321-325.

Dosi, G., Llerena, P., Labini, M. S., forthcoming. The relationships between science, technologies and their industrial exploitation: An illustration through the myths and realities of the so-called ‘European Paradox’. Research Policy, In print.

Evidence, 2003. PSA Target Metrics for the UK Research Base. UK Office of Science and Technology, London, October 2003. Available at: http://reporting.dti.gov.uk/cgi-bin/rr.cgi/http://www.dti.gov.uk/files/file14499.pdf (last visited on 25 September 2006).

Freeman, L. C., 1977. A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 40(1), 35-41.

Freeman, L. C., 1978/1979. Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215-239.

Granstrand, O., 1999. The Economics and Management of Intellectual Property: Towards Intellectual Capitalism. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.

Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., 2002. Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA/London.

Jin, B., Rousseau, R., 2004. Evaluation of research performance and scientometric indicators in China. In Moed, H. F., Glänzel, W., Schmoch, U. (Eds.), Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, etc., pp. 497-514.

King, D. A., 2004. The scientific impact of nations. Nature, 430(15 July 2004), 311-316.

Kostoff, R., 2004. The (scientific) wealth of nations. The Scientist, 18(18), 10.

Leydesdorff, L., 2005. The scientific impact of China. Scientometrics, 63(2), 411-412.

Leydesdorff, L., 2006. “Betweenness centrality” as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals. Paper presented at the 9th International Science Technology Indicators Conference, Leuven, Belgium, 7-9 September 2006.

Leydesdorff, L., Cozzens, S. E., Van Den Besselaar, P., 1994. Tracking areas of strategic importance using scientometric journal mappings. Research Policy, 23, 217-229.

Leydesdorff, L., Zhou, P., 2005. Are the contributions of China and Korea upsetting the world system of science? Scientometrics, 63(3), 617-630.

Leydesdorff, L., Zhou, P., forthcoming. Nanotechnology as a field of science: its delineation in terms of journals and patents. Scientometrics (under review).

Martin, B. R. 1991. The bibliometric assessment of UK scientific performance—A reply to Braun, Glänzel and Schubert. Scientometrics, 20, 333-357.

Meyer, M., Persson, O., 1998. Nanotechnology-interdisciplinarity, patterns of collaboration and differences in application. Scientometrics, 42(2), 195-205.

Mohrman, S, Wagner C. S., 2006. The Dynamics of Knowledge Creation: A Baseline for the Assessment of the Role and Contribution of the Department of Energy's Nanoscale Science Research Centers, University of Southern California, Marshall School of Business, Center of Effective Organizations, Los Angeles.

Narin, F., Hamilton, K. S., Olivastro, D., 1997. The increasing link between U.S. technology and public science. Research Policy, 26(3), 317-330.

National Science Board, 2006. Science and Engineering Indicators. NSF, Washington, DC.

Porter, A., Youtie, J., Shapira, P., 2006. Refining Search Terms for Nanotechnology. in preparation.

Shelton, R. D., 2006. Relations between national research investments inputs and publication outputs: application to the American Paradox. Paper presented at the 9th International Science Technology Indicators Conference, Leuven, Belgium, 7-9 September 2006.

Shelton, R. D., Holdridge, G. M., 2004. The US-EU race for leadership of science and technology. Scientometrics, 60(3), 353-363.

Sheu, M., Veefkind, V., Verbandt, Y., Galan, E. M., Absalom, R., Förster, W., 2006. Mapping nanotechnology patents: The EPO approach. World Patent Information, 28, 204-211.

Wagner, C. S., Leydesdorff, L., 2005. Mapping the network of global science: comparing international co-authorships from 1990 to 2000. International Journal of Technology and Globalization, 1(2), 185-208.

Zhou, P., Leydesdorff, L., 2006. The emergence of China as a leading nation in science. Research Policy, 35(1), 83-104.

Zhou, P., Leydesdorff, L., forthcoming. A Comparison between the China Scientific and Technical Papers and Citations Database and the Science Citation Index in terms of journal hierarchies and inter-journal citation relations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, In print.

Zitt, M., Bassecoulard, E., 2006. Delineating complex scientific fields by an hybrid lexical-citation method: A application to nanosciences. Information Processing and Management, 42, 1513-1531.

EPrints dLIST, an open access archive for the Information Sciences, is supported by the School of Information Resources and Library Science and Learning Technologies Center, University of Arizona. Established in 2002, dLIST has a global Advisory Board and is a part of the Information Technology & Society Research Lab. Open Archives
Contact: Admin | Donate