Home | Browse | Search | Credits | About
Register | User Area | DL-Harvest | Help
DLIST

The Biological Metaphor of a Second-Order Observer and the Sociological Discourse. Kybernetes 35 (3/4) (2006), 531-546

Leydesdorff, Loet (2006) The Biological Metaphor of a Second-Order Observer and the Sociological Discourse. Kybernetes 35 (3/4) (2006), 531-546 .

Full text available as:
HTM
PDF - Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader or other PDF viewer.

Abstract

• Purpose • In the tradition of Spencer Brown’s (1969) Laws of Form, observation was defined in Luhmann’s (1984) social systems theory as the designation of a distinction. In the sociological design, however, the designation specifies only a category for the observation. The distinction between observation and expectation enables the sociologist to appreciate the processing of meaning in social systems. • Design • The specification of “the observer” in the tradition of systems theory is analyzed in historical detail. Inconsistencies and differences in perspectives are explicated, and the specificity of human language is further specified. The processing of meaning in social systems adds another layer to the communication. • Findings • Reflexivity about the different perspectives of participant observers and an external observer is fundamental to the sociological discourse. The ranges of possible observations from different perspectives can be considered as second-order observations or equivalently as the specification of an uncertainty in the observations. This specification of an uncertainty provides us with an expectation. The expectation can be provided with (one or more) values by observations. The significance of observations can be tested when the expectations are properly specified. • Value • The expectations (second-order observations) are structured and therefore systemic attributes to the discourse. However, the metaphor of a (meta-)biological observer has disturbed the translation of social systems theory into sociological discourse. Different discourses specify other expectations about possible observations. By specifying second-order observations as expectations, social systems theory and sociocybernetics can combine the constructivist with an empirical approach.

EPrint Type:Preprint
Keywords:sociocybernetics, meaning, observer, social systems, observational report, expectation, communication
Subjects:Science Technology Studies
ID Code:1501
Deposited On:23 September 2006
Alternative Locations:http://www.leydesdorff.net/Kybernetes/
Eprint Statistics:View statistics for this eprint
Tell A Colleague:Tell a colleague about it.

Arthur, W. B. (1989), “Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-in by Historical Events”, Economic Journal, Vol 99, pp. 116-131.

Arthur, W. B. (1994), Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy, University of Michigan Press. Ann Arbor.

Baecker, D. (1996), “A Note on Composition,” Systems Research, Vol 13 No 3, pp. 195-203.

Baecker, D. (Ed.), (1999), Problems of Form, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.

Beck, U., W. Bonns, & C. Lau (2003), “The Theory of Reflexive Modernization: Problematic, Hypotheses and Research Program,” Theory, Culture & Society, Vol 20 No 2, pp. 1-33.

Bernstein, B. (1971), Class, Codes and Control, Vol. 1: Theoretical Studies in the Sociology of Language, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

Bhaskar, R. (1998), “Societies,” in M. Archer, R. Bhaskar, A. Collier, T. Lawson & A. Norrie (Eds.), Critical Realism: Essential Readings, Routledge, London, pp. 206-257.

Blauwhof, G. (1995), The Non-Linear Dynamics of Technological Developments: An Exploration of Telecommunications Technology. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Amsterdam.

Coser, R. L. (1975), “The Complexity of Roles as a Seedbed of Individual Autonomy”, in L. A. Coser (Ed.), The Idea of Social Structure. Papers in Honor of Robert K. Merton, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York/Chicago, pp. 237-264.

De Zeeuw, G. (1993), “Improvement and Research: A Paskian Evolution,” Systems Research, Vol 10 No 3, pp. 193-203.

Edelman, G. M. (1989), The Remembered Present: A Biological Theory of Consciousness, Basic Books, New York.

Fuchs, P. (2004), Der Sinn der Beobachtung: Begriffliche Untersuchungen, Weilerswist, Velbrück.

Geertz, C. (1973), The Interpretation of Cultures, Basic Books, New York.

Gibson, B. (2000), “Practical Applications of Luhmann’s Work: Observations from a Grounded Theory Perspective”, Luhmann On-Line, Vol 1 No 4. Available at http://www.sociocyberforum.org/newsletter/lol_nwsltr_1n4.pdf

Giddens, A. (1976), New Rules of Sociological Method, Hutchinson, London.

Giddens, A. (1979), Central Problems in Social Theory, Macmillan, London, etc.

Giddens, A. (1984), The Constitution of Society, Polity Press, Cambridge.

Glanville, R. (2002), “Heinz von Foerster”. Soziale Systeme, Vol 8 No 2, pp. 155-158.

Glaser, B. G. (1992), Emergence vs Forcing: Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis, Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA.

Goguen, J. A., & F. J. Varela. (1979), “Systems and Distinctions: Duality and Complementarity”, International Journal of General Systems, Vol. 5, pp. 31- 43.

Grathoff, R. (Ed.). (1978), The Theory of Social Action. The Correspondence of Alfred Schutz and Talcott Parsons, Indiana University Press, Bloomington and London.

Gumbrecht, H. U. (2003), What Will Remain of Niklas Luhmann's Philosophy? A Daring (and Loving) Speculation. Paper presented at The Opening of Systems Theory, Copenhagen, 23-25 May 2003.

Günther, G. (1967), “Time, Timeless Logic, and Self-Referential Systems,” Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., Vol 138, p. 396.

Habermas, J. (1981), Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M..

Habermas, J. (1987), “Excursus on Luhmann's Appropriation of the Philosophy of the Subject through Systems Theory”, in The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 368-385.

Habermas, J., & N. Luhmann. (1971), Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M.

Hollak, J. (1963), “Hegel, Marx en de Cybernetica,” Tijdschrift voor Philosophie, Vol. 25, pp. 270-294.

Kant, I. (1781, 21787 [1956]), Kritik der reinen Vernunft, Felix Meiner, Hamburg.

Kauffman, L. H. (2001), “The Mathematics of Charles Sanders Pierce,” Cybernetics & Human Knowing, Vol 8, Nos 1-2, pp. 79-110.

Knorr-Cetina, K. D., & A. V. Cicourel (Eds.). (1981), Advances in Social Theory and Methodology. Toward an Integration of Micro- and Macro-Sociologies. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1995), “Analyzing the Relations between Variables”, in B. G. Barnes (Ed.), Grounded Theory 1984-1994, Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA, pp. 83-102.

Leydesdorff, L. (1993), “‘Structure’/‘Action’ Contingencies and the Model of Parallel Processing”, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, Vol 23, No 1, pp. 47-77.

Leydesdorff, L. (1994), “The Evolution of Communication Systems,” Int. J. Systems Research and Information Science, Vol. 6, pp. 219-230.

Leydesdorff, L. (1997), “The Non-Linear Dynamics of Sociological Reflections”, International Sociology, Vol. 12, pp. 25-45.

Leydesdorff, L. (2000), “Luhmann, Habermas, and the Theory of Communication”, Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Vol. 17, pp. 273-288.

Leydesdorff, L. (2001a), “Technology and Culture: The Dissemination and the Potential ‘Lock-in’ of New Technologies.” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Vol 4, No 3, Paper 5. Available at http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/4/3/5.html.

Leydesdorff, L. (2001b), A Sociological Theory of Communication: The Self-Organization of the Knowledge-Based Society, Universal Publishers, Parkland, FL. Available at http://www.upublish.com/books/leydesdorff.htm .

Leydesdorff, L. (2002), “The Communication Turn in the Theory of Social Systems”, Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Vol. 19 No 2, pp. 129-136.

Leydesdorff, L. (2003), “The Construction and Globalization of the Knowledge Base in Inter-Human Communication Systems”, Canadian Journal of Communication, Vol 28 No 3, pp. 267-289.

Luhmann, N. (1975), “Interaktion, Organisation, Gesellschaft”, in Soziologische Aufklärung 2, Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, pp. 9-20.

Luhmann, N. (1984), Soziale Systeme. Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. M.

Luhmann, N. (1986), “The Autopoiesis of Social Systems,” in F. Geyer & J. v. d. Zouwen (Eds.), Sociocybernetic Paradoxes. Sage, London, pp. 172-192.

Luhmann, N. (1990a), Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M..

Luhmann, N. (1990b), “Sthenographie,” in Beobachter: Konvergenz der Erkenntnistheorien? Wilhelm Fink Verlag, München, pp. 119-137.

Luhmann, N. (1993).“Die Paradoxie der Form”, in D. Baecker (Hrsg.), Kalkül der Form, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. M., pp. 197-212.

Luhmann, N. (1995), Social Systems. Stanford University Press, Stanford.

Luhmann, N. (1997a), Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M.

Luhmann, N. (1997b), “Globalization of World Society: How to Conceive of Modern Society?” International Review of Sociology, Vol 7, No 1, pp. 67-79.

Luhmann, N. (2000), Organization und Entscheidung, Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen.

Luhmann, N., H. Maturana, M. Namiki, V. Redder, & F. Varela. (1990), Beobachter: Konvergenz der Erkenntnistheorien? Wilhelm Fink Verlag, München.

Marx, K. (1974), Grundrisse der Kritik der politischen Oekonomie [1857-1858], Dietz Verlag, Berlin.

Matsuno, K. (2003), „Quantum Mechanics in First, Second and Third Person Descriptions”, BioSystems, Vol 68, pp. 107-118.

Maturana, H. R. (1978), “Biology of Language: The Epistemology of Reality”, in G. A. Miller & E. Lenneberg (Eds.), Psychology and Biology of Language and Thought. Essays in Honor of Eric Lenneberg, Academic Press, New York, pp. 27-63.

Maturana, H. R. (1993), “The Biological Foundatons of Self Consciousness and the Physical Domain of Existence”, in N. Luhmann, H. Maturana, M. Namiki, V. Redder & F. Varela (Eds.), Beobachter: Konvergenz der Erkenntnistheorien? Wilhelm Fink Verlag, München.

Maturana, H. R. (2000), “The Nature of the Laws of Nature”, Systems Research and Behavioural Science, Vol. 17, pp. 459-468.

Maturana, H. R., & F. J. Varela. (1980), Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living, Reidel, Dordrecht, etc.

McLuhan, M. (1964), Understanding Media: The Extension of Man. McGraw-Hill, New York.

Münch, R. (1982), Theorie des Handelns, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M.. [(Understanding Modernity, Routledge, London/New York, 1988].

Parsons, T. S. (1937), The Structure of Social Action, The Free Press, Glencoe, IL.

Parsons, T. S. (1951), The Social System, The Free Press, New York.

Pask, G. (1975), Conversation, Cognition and Learning, Elsevier, Amsterdam.

Popper, K. R. (1967), The Poverty of Historicism, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

Shannon, C. E. (1948), “A Mathematical Theory of Communication”, Bell System Technical Journal, Vol. 27, pp. 379-423 and 623-356.

Simon, H. A. (1969), The Sciences of the Artificial, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA/London.

Spencer Brown, G. (1969), Laws of Form, George Allen and Unwin, London.

Spencer Brown, G. (1993/94), “Self-reference, Distinctions and Time”, Teoria Sociologica, Vol 2-3 No 1, pp. 47-53.

Varela, F. (1975), “A Calculus for Self-Reference”, International Journal of General Systems, Vol 2 No 1, pp. 5-24.

Varela, F. J. & J. A. Goguen (1978), “The Arithmetic of Closure”, Journal of Cybernetics Vol 8, pp. 291-324.

Von Foerster, H. (1975), “Notes on an Epistemology for Living Things”, in L’unité de l’homme, Plon, Paris.

Von Foerster, H. (1979), “Cybernetics of Cybernetics”, in K. Krippendorff (Ed.), Communication and Control in Society, Gordon and Breach, New York, pp. 5-8.

Von Foerster, H. (1982), Observing Systems, Intersystems Publications, Seaside, CA.

Von Foerster, H. (1999), “An Niklas Luhmann”, in T. M. Bardmann & D. Baecker (Eds.), Gibt es Eigentlich den Berliner Zoo noch? Erinnerungen an Niklas Luhmann, Universitätsverlag Konstanz, Konstanz, pp. 13-15.

Wasser, H. (2001), “Luhmanns Theorie Psychischer Systeme und das Freudsche Unbewusste: Zur Beobachtung Strukturfunktionaler Latenz“, Vielbeck Wissenschaft, Vol. 1. Available at http://www.velbrueck-wissenschaft.de/pdfs/haraldwasser.pdf.

Weaver, W. (1949), “Some Recent Contributions to the Mathematical Theory of Communication”, in C. E. Shannon & W. Weaver (Eds.), The Mathematical Theory of Communication, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, pp. 93-117.

Weber, M. (1917, 31968), “Der Sinn der ‘Wertfreiheit’ der Soziologischen und Ökonomischen Wissenschaften”, in Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre, Mohr, Tübingen, pp. 489-540.

EPrints dLIST, an open access archive for the Information Sciences, is supported by the School of Information Resources and Library Science and Learning Technologies Center, University of Arizona. Established in 2002, dLIST has a global Advisory Board and is a part of the Information Technology & Society Research Lab. Open Archives
Contact: Admin | Donate