Home | Browse | Search | Credits | About
Register | User Area | DL-Harvest | Help
DLIST

Information literacy education in the context of project work: Application of multiple intelligences and mediated learning

Mokhtar, Intan Azura and Majid, Shaheen (2006) Information literacy education in the context of project work: Application of multiple intelligences and mediated learning. In Khoo, C. and Singh, D. and Chaudhry, A.S., Eds. Proceedings A-LIEP 2006: Asia-Pacific Conference on Library & Information Education & Practice 2006, pages pp. 207-218, Singapore.

Full text available as:
PDF - Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader or other PDF viewer.

Abstract

Information literacy (IL) has become a vital competency in the current knowledge society. For students, the key to becoming independent learners and future knowledge workers lies in being information literate. However, existing information literacy education approaches have not been very successful in equipping students with these crucial skills to ensure deep erudition and long-lasting retention. Hence, pedagogy becomes critical in information literacy education. This research hypothesises that (i) informa-tion literacy skills have a positive impact on the quality of students’ project work; (ii) students grasp in-formation literacy skills more effectively when their innate interests, such as that determined by their re-spective dominant intelligences, are stimulated and applied to their work; and (iii) students internalise what they learn when they are coached over an extended period of time, on how to apply their newly ac-quired information literacy skills, and thus exhibit greater retention of such knowledge and competen-cies. Consequently they would produce work of better quality. To verify these postulations, an informa-tion literacy course was designed for students undertaking project work to equip them with the necessary information literacy skills, by using two established pedagogical approaches – Gardner’s Theory of Mul-tiple Intelligences and Feuerstein’s Mediated Learning Experience. Subsequently the quality of the pro-ject work between the experimental and control groups were compared. This on-going research seeks to identify a utilitarian and viable pedagogical methodology that makes the teaching and learning of infor-mation literacy skills more effective and long-lasting respectively.

EPrint Type:Conference Paper
Keywords:Information literacy education, Project work, Multiple intelligences, Mediated learning, Singapore
Subjects:Information Literacy
ID Code:1383
Deposited On:24 May 2007
Eprint Statistics:View statistics for this eprint
Tell A Colleague:Tell a colleague about it.

American Library Association (1989). Presidential committee on information literacy: Final report. Washington, D. C., January 10, 1989, para.3. Retrieved December 15, 2005 from http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlpubs/whitepapers/presidential.htm

Bell, S. J. (2004). The infodiet: How libraries can offer an appetizing alternative to Google. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 50(24), B15.

Boeree, C. G. (1997). Carl Jung. Personality Theories. Retrieved December 15, 2005 from, http://www.ship.edu/~cgboeree/jung.html

Bowler, L., Large, A., & Rejskind, G. (2001). Primary school students, information literacy and the Web. Education for Information. 19(3), pp.201-224.

Brown, C., Murphy, T., & Nanny, M. (2003). Turning techno-savvy into info-savvy: Authentically integrating information literacy into the college curriculum. The Journal of Academic Librarian-ship. 29(6), 389-398.

Bruce, C. S. (1997). Seven faces of information literacy. South Australia: AUSLIB Press, Adelaide. pp.35-41, 110-147.

Bruce, C. S. (2002). Information literacy as a catalyst for educational change: A background paper. White Paper prepared for UNESCO, the U.S. National Commission on Libraries and Information Science, and the National Forum on Information Literacy. Information Literacy Meeting of Ex-perts, Prague, The Czech Republic, July 2002. Retrieved December 15, 2005 from http://www.ched.uct.ac.za/cil/Prague2003/Papers/bruce.pdf

Chard, S. (2001). Project approach in early childhood and elementary education. Project Approach. Retrieved December 15, 2005 from http://www.project-approach.com/foundation/learning.htm

Cognard, A. (2004, June 10). Cognard’s philosophy: Find the ‘Ah’ moment. USA Today.

Feuerstein, R. (1980). Instrumental enrichment: An intervention program for cognitive modifiability. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.

Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of Multiple Intelligences. NY: Basic Books.

Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple Intelligences: The theory in practice. NY: Basic Books, p. xv.

Gardner, H. (2003). Multiple intelligences after twenty years. Paper presented at the American Educa-tional Research Association, Chicago, Illinois. Invited address, April 21, 2003. Retrieved Decem-ber 15, 2005 from http://pzweb.harvard.edu/PIs/HG_MI_after_20_years.pdf

Grafstein, A. (2002). A discipline-based approach to information literacy. The Journal of Academic Librarianship.28(4), 197-204.

Grant, M. M. (2002). Getting a grip on project-based learning: Theory, cases and recommendations. Meridian. 5(1). Retrieved December 15, 2005 from http://www.ncsu.edu/meridian/win2002/514/

Hampton, D. R., Summer, C. E., & Webber, R. A. (1987). Organizational Behavior and the Practice of Management. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman. p.256.

Hart, G. (2000). Project work as a vehicle for information literacy education in a circuit of South Afri-can primary schools. 66th IFLA Council and General Conference, Jerusalem, Israel. August, 13-18, 2000. Retrieved December 15, 2005 from http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla66/papers/074-133e.htm

Heil, D. (2005). The internet and student research: Teaching critical evaluation skills. Teacher Librar-ian, 33(2), 26-29.

Hickey, M. G. (2004). “Can I pick more than one project?” – Case studies of five teachers who used MI-based instructional planning. Teachers College Record, 106(1), 77-86.

Jacobsen, T. E., & Mark, B. L. (2000). Separating wheat from chaff: Helping first year students be-come information savvy. Journal of General Education. 49(4), 256-278.

Janssen, O., Van de Vliert, E., & Veenstra, C. (1999). How task and person conflict shape the role of positive interdependence in management teams. Journal of Management, 25, 117-141.

Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 530-557.

Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 741-763.

Julien, H., & Boon, S. (2002). From the front line: Information literacy instruction in Canadian aca-demic libraries. Reference Services Review. 30(2), 143-149.

Kasowitz-Scheer, A., & Pasqualoni, M. (2002). Information literacy instruction in higher education: Trends and issues. ERIC Digest. Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information and Technol-ogy. ED 465375.

Markuson, C. (1996). From clay to copper. Retrieved December 15, 2005 from http://www.sirs.com/corporate/newsletters/link/linksp96.htm

Moore, P. (2002). An analysis of information literacy education worldwide. White Paper prepared for UNESCO, the U.S. National Commission on Libraries and Information Science, and the National Forum on Information Literacy. Information Literacy Meeting of Experts, Prague, The Czech Re-public, July 2002. Retrieved December 15, 2005 from http://www.nclis.gov/libinter/infolitconf&meet/papers/moore-fullpaper.pdf

Moore, S. (1991). Understanding and managing diversity among groups at work: Key issues for organ-isational training and development. Journal of European Industrial Training, 23(4-5), 208-217.

NSW Department of Education and Training (2002). Multiple Intelligences. inform.October 2002. Re-trieved December 15, 2005 from https://www.det.nsw.edu.au/inform/yr2002/oct/multiple.htm

O’Sullivan, C. (2002). Is information literacy relevant in the real world? Reference Services Review. 30(1), 7-14.

Orr, D., Appleton, M., & Wallin, M. (2001). Information literacy and flexible delivery: Creating a con-ceptual framework and model. Journal of Academic Librarianship. 27(6), 457-463.

Pech, R. J. (2001). Termites, group behaviour, and the loss of innovation: Conformity rules! Journal of Managerial Psychology, 16(7), 559-574.

Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 1-28.

Rader, H. B. (2002). Information literacy – an emerging global priority. White Paper prepared for UNESCO, the U.S. National Commission on Libraries and Information Science, and the National Forum on Information Literacy. Information Literacy Meeting of Experts, Prague, The Czech Re-public, July 2002. Retrieved December 15, 2005 from http://www.nclis.gov/libinter/infolitconf&meet/papers/rader-fullpaper.pdf

Rockman, I. F. (2003). Information literacy, a worldwide priority for the twenty-first century. Refer-ence Services Review. 31(3), 209-210.

Slavin, R. E. (1995). Enhancing intergroup relations in schools: Cooperative learning and other strate-gies. In W. D. Hawley & A. W. Wells (Eds.), Toward a common destiny: Improving race and eth-nic relations in America (pp. 291–314). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Smith, M. K. (1999). Learning theory. The Encyclopedia of Informal Education (infed), 1999. Re-trieved December 15, 2005 from http://www.infed.org/biblio/b-learn.htm.

Spitzer, K. S., Eisenberg, M. B., & Lowe, C. A. (1998). Information literacy: Essential skills for the information age. ERIC Digest. Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information & Technology. ED 427780.

Staw, B. M., Sandelands, L. E., & Dutton, J. E. (1981). Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behav-ior: A multilevel analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 501-524.

Stoffle, C. J. (1998). Literacy 101 for the digital age. American Libraries. 29(11), 46-48.

Timpson, W. M., Winokur, M. A., & Merline, A. M. (2002). Skills for success in college: What stu-dents need from high school. International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning. 6(4), 2002. Retrieved December 15, 2005 from http://www.ucalgary.ca/~iejll/volume6/timpson.html#exploring

United States Department of Education (1983). A nation at risk. National Commission on Excellence in Education. Retrieved December 15, 2005 from http://www.ed.gov/pubs/NatAtRisk/risk.html

Virkus, S. (2003). Information literacy in Europe: A literature review. Information Research,8(4), pa-per no. 159. Retrieved December 15, 2005 from http://informationr.net/ir/8-4/paper159.html

Webber, S. & Johnston, B. (2000). Conceptions of information literacy: New perspectives and implica-tions. Journal of Information Science. 26(6), 381-397.

EPrints dLIST, an open access archive for the Information Sciences, is supported by the School of Information Resources and Library Science and Learning Technologies Center, University of Arizona. Established in 2002, dLIST has a global Advisory Board and is a part of the Information Technology & Society Research Lab. Open Archives
Contact: Admin | Donate