Reading from paper versus screens: a critical review of the empirical literature
(1992) Reading from paper versus screens: a critical review of the empirical literature. Ergonomics 35(10):pp. 1297-1326.
Full text available as: |
Abstract
This item is not the definitive copy. Please use the following citation when referencing this material: Dillon, A. (1992) Reading from paper versus screens: a critical review of the empirical literature. Ergonomics, 35(10), 1297-1326. Abstract: The advent of widespread computer use in general and increasing developments in the domain of hypertext in particular have increased awareness of the issue of reading electronic text. To date the literature has been dominated by reference to work on overcoming speed deficits resulting from poor image quality but an emerging literature reveals a more complex set of variables at work. The present review considers the differences between the media in terms of outcomes and processes of reading and concludes that single variable explanations are insufficient to capture the range of issues involved in reading from screens.
| EPrint Type: | Journal Article (Paginated) |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | Visual processing, electronic text, reader performance |
| Subjects: | Human Computer Interaction |
| ID Code: | 1238 |
| Deposited On: | 17 July 2006 |
| Alternative Locations: | http://www.gslis.utexas.edu/~adillon/Journals/Reading.htm |
| Eprint Statistics: | View statistics for this eprint |
| Tell A Colleague: | Tell a colleague about it. |