Home | Browse | Search | Credits | About
Register | User Area | DL-Harvest | Help
DLIST

Manual Evaluation of Robot Performance in Identifying Open Access Articles

Hajjem, Chawki and Harnad, Stevan (2006) Manual Evaluation of Robot Performance in Identifying Open Access Articles. Technical Report.

Full text available as:
HTML
PDF - Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader or other PDF viewer.
Rich Text Format - Requires a viewer, such as Microsoft Word

Abstract

Antelman et al. (2005) hand-tested the accuracy of the algorithm that Hajjem et al.'s (2005) software robot used to to trawl the web and automatically identify Open Access (OA) and Non-Open-Access (NOA) articles (references derived from the ISI database). Antelman et al. found much lower accuracy than Hajjem et al. Had reported. Hajjem et al. have now re-done the hand-testing on a larger sample (1000) in Biology, and demonstrated that Hajjem et al.'s original estimate of the robot's accuracy was much closer to the correct one. The discrepancy was because both Antelman et al. And Hajjem et al had hand-checked a sample other than the one the robot was sampling. Our present sample, identical with what the robot saw, yielded: d' 2.62, bias 0.68, true OA 93%, false OA 12%. We also checked whether the OA citation advantage (the ratio of the average citation counts for OA articles to the average citation counts for NOA articles in the same journal/issue) was an artifact of false OA: The robot-based OA citation Advantage of OA over NOA for this sample [(OA-NOA)/NOA x 100] was 70%. We partitioned this into the ratio of the citation counts for true (93%) OA articles to the NOA articles versus the ratio of the citation counts for the false (12%) "OA" articles. The "false OA" advantage for this 12% of the articles was 33%, so there is definitely a false OA Advantage bias component in our results. However, the true OA advantage, for 93% of the articles, was 77%. So in fact, we are underestimating the true OA advantage.

Commentary on:Antelman, Kristin and Bakkalbasi, Nisa and Goodman, David and Hajjem, Chawki and Harnad, Stevan (2005) Evaluation of Algorithm Performance on Identifying OA. Technical Report.
EPrint Type:Technical Report
Keywords:open access, citation analysis, signal detection analysis, scientometrics
Subjects:Citation Analysis
ID Code:1102
Deposited On:31 March 2006
Alternative Locations:http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/12220/, http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/76-guid.html
Eprint Statistics:View statistics for this eprint
Tell A Colleague:Tell a colleague about it.

Commentary/Response Threads

EPrints dLIST, an open access archive for the Information Sciences, is supported by the School of Information Resources and Library Science and Learning Technologies Center, University of Arizona. Established in 2002, dLIST has a global Advisory Board and is a part of the Information Technology & Society Research Lab. Open Archives
Contact: Admin | Donate