Home | Browse | Search | Credits | About
Register | User Area | DL-Harvest | Help
DLIST

Can Scientific Journals be Classified in terms of Aggregated Journal-Journal Citation Relations using the Journal Citation Reports?

Leydesdorff, Loet (2006) Can Scientific Journals be Classified in terms of Aggregated Journal-Journal Citation Relations using the Journal Citation Reports? .

Full text available as:
PDF - Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader or other PDF viewer.

Abstract

This is a preprint of an article published in Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57 (5):601-613, 2006. The aggregated citation relations among journals included in the Science Citation Index provide us with a huge matrix which can be analyzed in various ways. Using principal component analysis or factor analysis, the factor scores can be used as indicators of the position of the cited journals in the citing dimensions of the database. Unrotated factor scores are exact, and the extraction of principal components can be made stepwise since the principal components are independent. Rotation may be needed for the designation, but in the rotated solution a model is assumed. This assumption can be legitimated on pragmatic or theoretical grounds. Since the resulting outcomes remain sensitive to the assumptions in the model, an unambiguous classification is no longer possible in this case. However, the factor-analytic solutions allow us to test classifications against the structures contained in the database. This will be demonstrated for the delineation of a set of biochemistry journals.

EPrint Type:Preprint
Keywords:journal, map, classification, citation, factor, component, analysis, covariance
Subjects:Classification
ID Code:1095
Deposited On:19 March 2006
Alternative Locations:http://www.leydesdorff.net/classif03
Eprint Statistics:View statistics for this eprint
Tell A Colleague:Tell a colleague about it.

Bensman, S. J. (2004). Pearson’s R and Author Cocitation Analysis: A Commentary on the Controversy. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(10), 935-936.

Bensman, S. J. (2005). Citations as Measures of Journal Importance: Total Citations Vs. Impact Factor in Chemistry. Scientometrics, forthcoming.

Burt, R. S. (1982). Toward a Structural Theory of Action. New York, etc.: Academic Press.

Crane, D. (1972). Invisible Colleges. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Doreian, P., & Fararo, T. J. (1985). Structural Equivalence in a Journal Network. Journal of the American Society of Information Science 36, 28-37.

Dupré, J. (1993). The Disorder of Things. Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Galison, P. L., & Stump, D. (Eds.). (1995). The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Context, and Power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Garfield, E. (1979). Citation Indexing: Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities. New York: John Wiley.

Garfield, E., Malin, M. V., & Small, H. (1975). A System for Automatic Classification of Scientific Literature. Journal of the Indian Institute of Science, 57(2), 61-74.

Garson, G. D. (2004). Quantitative Research in Public Administration. Retrieved October 28, 2004, from http://www2.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/pa765/factor.htm .

Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2003). A New Classification Scheme of Science Fields and Subfields Designed for Scientometric Evaluation Purposes. Scientometrics, 56(3), 357-367.

Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology 78 (6), 1360-1380.

Hempel, C. G., & Oppenheim, P. (1948). Studies in the Logic of Explanation. Philosophy of Science, 15, 135-175.

Hull, D. L. (2001). Science and Selection: Essays on Biological Evolution and the Philosophy of Science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Kant, I. (1781, 21787). Kritik der reinen Vernunft (Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1956).

Kim, J.-O. (1975). Factor Analysis. In N. H. Nie, C. H. Hull, J. G. Jenkins, K. Steinbrenner & D. H. Bent (Eds.), SPSS: Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (pp. 468-514.). New York, etc.: McGrawHill.

Kim, J.-O., & Mueller, C. W. (1978). Factor Analysis, Statistical Methods and Practical Issues. Beverly Hills, etc.: Sage.

Klavans, R., & Boyack, K. W. (2004). Identifying a Better Measure of Relatedness for Mapping the Backbone of Science. Unpublished manuscript.

Knaster, B., & Kuratowski, C. (1921). Sur les ensembles connexes. Fund. Math., 2, 206-255.

Kochen, M. (1983). Mathematical Model for the Growth of Two Specialties. Science of Science, 3(11), 199-217.

Leydesdorff, L. (1986). The Development of Frames of References,. Scientometrics 9, 103-125.

Leydesdorff, L. (1987). Various Methods for the Mapping of Science. Scientometrics 11, 291-320.

Leydesdorff, L. (1993). The Impact of Citation Behaviour on Citation Structure. In A. F. J. van Raan, R. E. de Bruin, H. F. Moed, A. J. Nederhof & R. W. J. Tijssen (Eds.), Science and Technology in a Policy Context (pp. 289-300.). Leiden: DSWO/ Leiden University Press.

Leydesdorff, L. (1993b). ‘Structure’/‘Action’ Contingencies and the Model of Parallel Processing. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 23(1), 47-77.

Leydesdorff, L. (2002a). Dynamic and Evolutionary Updates of Classificatory Schemes in Scientific Journal Structures. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(12), 987-994.

Leydesdorff, L. (2002b). Indicators of Structural Change in the Dynamics of Science: Entropy Statistics of the SCI Journal Citation Reports. Scientometrics, 53(1), 131-159.

Leydesdorff, L. (2004a). Clusters and Maps of Science Journals Based on Bi-Connected Graphs in the Journal Citation Reports. Journal of Documentation, 60(4), 371-427.

Leydesdorff, L. (2004b). Top-Down Decomposition of the Journal Citation Report of the Social Science Citation Index: Graph- and Factor-Analytical Approaches. Scientometrics, 60(2), 159-180.

Leydesdorff, L., & Bensman, S. J. Citations, Powerlaws, and Logarithmic Transformations (in preparation).

Leydesdorff, L., & Cozzens, S. E. (1993). The Delineation of Specialties in Terms of Journals Using the Dynamic Journal Set of the Science Citation Index. Scientometrics, 26, 133-154.

Leydesdorff, L., Cozzens, S. E. & Van den Besselaar, P. (1994). Tracking Areas of Strategic Importance Using Scientometric Journal Mappings. Research Policy, 23, 217-229.

Leydesdorff, L., & Jin, B. (2005). Mapping the Chinese Science Citation Database in Terms of Aggregated Journal-Journal Citation Relations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, (forthcoming).

Marshakova, I. V. (1973). Bibliographic Coupling System Based on References, Nauch-Tekhn. Inform. Ser. 2 SSR 2, 3-8.

Moody, J., & White, D. R. (2003). Structural Cohesion and Embeddedness: A Hierarchical Concept of Social Groups. American Sociological Review, 68(1), 103-127.

Nagel, E. (1961). The Structure of Science. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Narin, F. (1976). Evaluative Bibliometrics: The Use of Publication and Citation Analysis in the Evaluation of Scientific Activity. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.

Narin, F., Carpenter, M., & Berlt, N. C. (1972). Interrelationships of Scientific Journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 23, 323-331.

Narin, F., & Carpenter, M. P. (1975). National Publication and Citation Comparisons,. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 26, 80-93.

Neurath, O., Carnap, R., & Hahn, H. (1929). Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung - Der Wiener Kreis. Vienna: Veröffentlichungen des Vereins Ernst Mach.

Newton, I. (1687). Principia; F. Cajori (Ed.), Sir Isaac Newton's Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy and His System of the World; Translated into English by Andrew Motte in 1729. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1934.

Noma, E. (1982). An Improved Method for Analyzing Square Scientometric Transaction Matrices,. Scientometrics 4, 297-316.

Otte, E., & Rousseau, R. (2002). Social Network Analysis: A Powerful Strategy, Also for the Information Sciences. Journal of Information Science, 28(6), 443-455.

Popper, K. R. ([1935] 1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson.

Price, D. J. de Solla (1963). Little Science, Big Science. New York: Columbia University Press.

Price, D. J. de Solla (1965). Networks of Scientific Papers. Science 149, 510- 515.

Price, D. J. de Solla. (1981). The Analysis of Square Matrices of Scientometric Transactions. Scientometrics 3, 55-63.

Pudovkin, A. I., & Garfield, E. (2002). Algorithmic Procedure for Finding Semantically Related Journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(13), 1113-1119.

Small, H., & Griffith, B. (1974). The Structure of the Scientific Literature I. Science Studies 4, 17-40.

Small, H., & Garfield, E. (1985). The Geography of Science: Disciplinary and National Mappings. Journal of Information Science, 11, 147-159.

Tijssen, R., De Leeuw, J., & Van Raan, A. F. J. (1987). Quasi-Correspondence Analysis on Square Scientometric Transaction Matrices. Scientometrics 11, 347-361.

Van den Besselaar, P., & Heimeriks, G. (2001). Disciplinary, Multidisciplinary, Interdisciplinary: Concepts and Indicators. Paper presented at the 8th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics - ISSI2001, Sydney.

Van den Besselaar, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (1996). Mapping Change in Scientific Specialties: A Scientometric Reconstruction of the Development of Artificial Intelligence. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47, 415-436.

Wouters, P. (1999). The Citation Culture. Amsterdam: Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Amsterdam.

EPrints dLIST, an open access archive for the Information Sciences, is supported by the School of Information Resources and Library Science and Learning Technologies Center, University of Arizona. Established in 2002, dLIST has a global Advisory Board and is a part of the Information Technology & Society Research Lab. Open Archives
Contact: Admin | Donate