Home | Browse | Search | Credits | About
Register | User Area | DL-Harvest | Help
DLIST

Towards a Continuum of Scholarship: The Eventual Collapse of the Distinction Between Grey and non-Grey Literature

Banks, Marcus A. (2005) Towards a Continuum of Scholarship: The Eventual Collapse of the Distinction Between Grey and non-Grey Literature . In Farace, Dr. Dominic, Eds. Proceedings Conference on Grey Literature, Nancy, France.

Full text available as:
PDF - Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader or other PDF viewer.

Abstract

This paper argues that the distinction between grey and non-grey (or white) literature will become less relevant over time, as online discovery options proliferate. In the meantime, the political success of the open access publishing movement has valuable lessons for proponents of increasing access to grey literature.

EPrint Type:Conference Paper
Keywords:grey literature gray literature public health information seeking open access political activism activism
Subjects:Scholarly Communication
Academic Libraries
Information Seeking Behaviors
Social Informatics
ID Code:1079
Deposited On:07 March 2006
Eprint Statistics:View statistics for this eprint
Tell A Colleague:Tell a colleague about it.

1. Royal Society: Brief History of the Society. http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/page.asp?id=2176 [Accessed 21 November 2005].

2. Conn VS, Valentine JC, Cooper HM, and Rantz MJ. (2003), Gray literature in meta-analyses. In: Nursing Research, 52 (4) July-August 2003, pp. 256–61. – ISSN 0029-6562

3. Center for Science in the Public Interest: Integrity in Science Conference. http://www.cspinet.org/integrity/conflictedscience_conf.html [Accessed 21 November 2005].

4. Wilson B. (2003), Improving access to STM literature: the need for continuing dialogue. In: D-Lib Magazine, 9 (6) June 2003. – ISSN 1082-9873. Available online at: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june03/06editorial.html [Accessed 21 November 2005].

5. Lynch C.A. (2003), Institutional repositories: essential infrastructure for scholarship in the digital age. In: ARL Bimonthly Report, 226, February 2003, pp. 1-7. Available online at: http://www.arl.org/newsltr/226/ir.html [Accessed 21 November 2005].

6. SPARC Open Access Newsletter: Open Access in 2003. http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/newsletter/01-02-04.htm#2003 [Accessed 21 November 2005].

7. Timeline of the Open Access Movement. http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/timeline.htm [Accessed 21 November 2005].

8. FOS Forum: Eddy van der Maarel Statement. http://lists.topica.com/lists/fos-forum/read/message.html?mid=902159566&sort=d&start=44 [Accessed 21 November 2005].

9. The impact of serial costs on library collections. In: ARL Bimonthly Report, 218, October 2001, p. 9. Available online at: http://www.arl.org/newsltr/218/costimpact.html [Accessed 21 November 2005].

10. Scholarly Publishing & Academic Resources Coalition. http://www.arl.org/sparc/ [Accesed 21 November 2005].

11. Original Proposal for E-biomed (Draft and Addendum). http://www.nih.gov/about/director/pubmedcentral/ebiomedarch.htm [Accessed 21 November 2005].

12. Kling R, Fortuna J, King A. (2002), The Remarkable Transformation of E-Biomed into PubMed Central. Available online at: http://rkcsi.indiana.edu/archive/CSI/WP/wp01-03B.html [Accessed 21 November 2005].

13. Principles for Emerging Systems of Scholarly Publishing. http://www.arl.org/scomm/tempe.html [Accessed 21 November 2005].

14. Budapest Open Access Initiative. http://www.soros.org/openaccess/ [Accessed 21 November 2005].

15. Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing. http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/bethesda.htm [Accessed 21 November 2005].

16. Public Access to Science Act. http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=108_cong_bills&docid=f:h2613ih.txt.pdf [Accessed 21 November 2005].

17. Public Access Home Page. http://publicaccess.nih.gov/ [Accessed 21 November 2005].

18. NIH Public Access: September 2005 Submission Statistics. http://nihms.nih.gov/stats/2005-09.html [Accessed 21 November 2005].

19. Open Access a Must for Wellcome Trust Researchers. http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/doc_WTX026822.html [Accessed 21 November 2005].

20. ATA: The Alliance for Taxpayer Access. http://www.taxpayeraccess.org/ [Accessed 21 November 2005].

21. Gray BH. (1998), Sources used in health policy research and implications for information retrieval systems. In: Journal of Urban Health, 75 (4), December 1998, pp. 842-852. – ISSN 1099-3460.

22. New York Academy of Medicine Library: Grey Literature Report. http://www.nyam.org/library/greyreport.shtml [Accessed 21 November 2005].

23. CNLP: Research Projects. http://www.cnlp.org/research/project.asp?recid=34 [Accessed 21 November 2005].

24. arXiv.org e-Print Archive. http://arxiv.org/ [Accessed 21 November 2005].

25. Welcome to the NDIIPP. http://digitalpreservation.gov/ [Accessed 21 November 2005].

26. Self-Archiving FAQ. http://www.eprints.org/openaccess/self-faq/ [Accessed 21 November 2005].

27. Overture: The Subversive Proposal. http://www.arl.org/scomm/subversive/sub01.html [Accessed 21 November 2005].

28. Dspace Federation. http://dspace.org/ [Accessed 21 November 2005].

29. Dspace Instances: Dspace Wiki. http://wiki.dspace.org/DspaceInstances [Accessed 21 November 2005].

30. Lynch C.A. (2003), Institutional repositories: essential infrastructure for scholarship in the digital age. In: ARL Bimonthly Report, 226, February 2003, pp. 1-7. Available online at: http://www.arl.org/newsltr/226/ir.html [Accessed 21 November 2005].

31. Foster N.F., Gibbons, S. (2005), Understanding faculty to improve content recruitment for institutional repositories. In: D-Lib Magazine, 11 (1) January 2005. – ISSN 1082-9873. Available online at: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january05/foster/01foster.html [Accessed 21 November 2005].

32. Ware M. (2004), Institutional repositories and scholarly publishing. In: Learned Publishing, 17 (2) April 2004 – ISSN 0953-1513.

33. van Westrienen G, Lynch CA. (2005), Academic institutional repositories: deployment status in 13 nations as of mid 2005. In: D-Lib Magazine, 11 (9) September 2005. – ISSN 1082-9873. Available online at: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september05/westrienen/09westrienen.html [Accessed 21 November 2005].

34. Lynch CA, Lippincott JK. Institutional repository deployment in the United States as of early 2005. In: D-Lib Magazine, 11 (9) September 2005. – ISSN 1082-9873. Available online at: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september05/lynch/09lynch.html [Accessed 21 November 2005].

EPrints dLIST, an open access archive for the Information Sciences, is supported by the School of Information Resources and Library Science and Learning Technologies Center, University of Arizona. Established in 2002, dLIST has a global Advisory Board and is a part of the Information Technology & Society Research Lab. Open Archives
Contact: Admin | Donate